The DOI matches its Crossref record.
A layered agarose approach to fabricate depth‐dependent inhomogeneity in chondrocyte‐seeded constructs
Open accessAbstract
Inspired by the depth‐dependent inhomogeneity of articular cartilage, it was hypothesized that a novel layered agarose technique, using a 2% (wt/vol) top and a 3% (wt/vol) bottom layer, would create an inhomogenous tissue construct with distinct material properties in conjoined regions. The biochemical and mechanical development of these constructs was observed alongside uniform 2% and 3% constructs. Initially, uniform 3% agarose disks had the highest bulk Young's modulus (EY ∼ 28 kPa) of all groups. After 28 days of culture in 20% FBS‐containing media, however, uniform 2% chondrocyte‐seeded constructs achieved the highest Young's modulus compared to bilayered and 3% agarose disks. Though all three groups contained similar GAG content (∼ 1.5% ww), uniform 2% agarose disks on day 28 possessed the highest collagen content (∼ 1% ww). Unlike in either homogeneous construct type, microscopic analysis of axial strain fields in bilayered constructs in response to applied static compression revealed two mechanically disparate regions on day 0: a softer 2% layer and a stiffer 3% layer. With time in culture, this inhomogeneity became less distinct, as indicated by increased continuity in both the local displacement field and local EY, and depended on the level of FBS supplementation of the feed media, with lower FBS concentrations (10%) more closely maintaining the original distinction of material properties. These results shed positive light on a layered agarose technique for the production of inhomogeneous bilayered chondrocyte‐seeded agarose constructs with applications for investigations of chondrocyte mechanotransduction and for possible use in the tissue engineering of inhomogeneous articular cartilage constructs. © 2004 Orthopaedic Research Society. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Chung, C., & Burdick, J. A. (2008) · Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.addr.2007.08.027 · Cited by 760
Mouser, V. H. M., Melchels, F. P. W., Visser, J., Dhert, W. J. A., Gawlitta, D., & Malda, J. (2016) · Biofabrication · doi:10.1088/1758-5090/8/3/035003 · Cited by 359
Tissue engineering of functional articular cartilage: the current status
Kock, L., van Donkelaar, C. C., & Ito, K. (2012) · Cell and Tissue Research · doi:10.1007/s00441-011-1243-1 · Cited by 339
Mechanical Properties of Natural Cartilage and Tissue-Engineered Constructs
Little, C. J., Bawolin, N. K., & Chen, X. (2011) · Tissue Engineering Part B: Reviews · doi:10.1089/ten.teb.2010.0572 · Cited by 314
Ahearne, M., Yang, Y., El Haj, A. J., Then, K. Y., & Liu, K.-K. (2005) · Journal of The Royal Society Interface · doi:10.1098/rsif.2005.0065 · Cited by 313
Metadata
- Authors
- Ng, K. W., Wang, C. C. ‐., Mauck, R. L., Kelly, T. N., Chahine, N. O., Costa, K. D., Ateshian, G. A., & Hung, C. T.
- Venue
- Journal of Orthopaedic Research
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2005-01
- Volume
- 23
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 134-141
- ISSN
- 0736-0266 (ISSN-L)
- 1554-527X
- OpenAlex
- W2006081568
- Cited by
- 162
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 3.48
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A layered agarose approach to fabricate depth‐dependent inhomogeneity in chondrocyte‐seeded constructs. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.orthres.2004.05.015
- The paper
- Ng, K. W., Wang, C. C. ‐., Mauck, R. L., Kelly, T. N., Chahine, N. O., Costa, K. D., Ateshian, G. A., & Hung, C. T. (2005). A layered agarose approach to fabricate depth‐dependent inhomogeneity in chondrocyte‐seeded constructs. Journal of Orthopaedic Research. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.orthres.2004.05.015
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.