The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The effect of bone microstructure on the initiation and growth of microcracks
Open accessAbstract
Osteonal bone is often compared to a composite material and to metals as discontinuities within the material may provide sites of stress concentration for crack initiation and serve as barriers to crack growth. However, little experimental data exist to back up these hypotheses. Fluorescent chelating agents were applied at specific intervals to bone specimens fatigue tested in cyclic compression at a stress range of 80 MPa. The failed specimens were sectioned and labelled microcracks identified using UV epifluorescence microscopy. Microcrack lengths were measured and their relationship to cement lines surrounding secondary osteons recorded. Microcrack length at the time of encountering a cement line was also measured. Microcracks of less than 100 μm stopped growing when they encountered a cement line. Microcracks of greater than 100 μm in length continued to grow after encountering a cement line surrounding an osteon. Only microcracks greater than 300 μm in length were capable of penetrating osteons and these microcracks were the only ones which were observed to cause failure in the specimen. These experimental data support the hypothesis that secondary osteons act as barriers to crack propagation in compact bone. However, it shows that this microstructural barrier effect is dependent on the crack length at the time of encountering an osteon. For the vast majority of cracks, osteons act as barriers to growth but for the minority of cracks that are long enough and do break through the cement line, an osteon may actually act as a weakness in the bone and facilitate crack propagation. © 2004 Orthopaedic Research Society. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Compact bone fatigue damage—I. Residual strength and stiffness
Carter, D. R., & Hayes, W. C. (1977) · Journal of Biomechanics · doi:10.1016/0021-9290(77)90005-7 · Cited by 268
Cited by
Dilatational band formation in bone
Poundarik, A. A., Diab, T., Sroga, G. E., Ural, A., Boskey, A. L., Gundberg, C. M., & Vashishth, D. (2012) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1201513109 · Cited by 265
Allen, M. R., Iwata, K., Phipps, R., & Burr, D. B. (2006) · Bone · doi:10.1016/j.bone.2006.04.028 · Cited by 253
Sub-lamellar microcracking and roles of canaliculi in human cortical bone
Ebacher, V., Guy, P., Oxland, T. R., & Wang, R. (2012) · Acta Biomaterialia · doi:10.1016/j.actbio.2011.11.013 · Cited by 61
Effects of fatigue induced damage on the longitudinal fracture resistance of cortical bone
Fletcher, L., Codrington, J., & Parkinson, I. (2014) · Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Medicine · doi:10.1007/s10856-014-5213-5 · Cited by 12
Osteonal Damage Patterns from Ballistic and Blunt Force Trauma in Human Long Bones
Sexton, K., Schwab, N., Galtés, I., Casas, A., Armentano, N., Brillas, P., Garrido, X., & Jordana, X. (2024) · Life · doi:10.3390/life14020220 · Cited by 8
Metadata
- Authors
- O'Brien, F. J., Taylor, D., & Lee, T. C.
- Venue
- Journal of Orthopaedic Research
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2005-03
- Volume
- 23
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 475-480
- ISSN
- 0736-0266 (ISSN-L)
- 1554-527X
- OpenAlex
- W1968961573
- Cited by
- 211
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 7.75
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The effect of bone microstructure on the initiation and growth of microcracks. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.orthres.2004.08.005
- The paper
- O'Brien, F. J., Taylor, D., & Lee, T. C. (2005). The effect of bone microstructure on the initiation and growth of microcracks. Journal of Orthopaedic Research. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.orthres.2004.08.005
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.