Cited by 132Nasal Surgery and Airway StudiesSinusitis and nasal conditionsCleft Lip and Palate Research

Evidence supporting functional rhinoplasty or nasal valve repair: A 25‐year systematic review

Rhee, John S., Arganbright, Jill M., McMullin, Brian T., Hannley, Maureen·2008·Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery

Abstract

Objective: To systematically review the existing literature supporting the efficacy of modern‐day rhinoplasty techniques for treatment of nasal obstruction due to nasal valve compromise. Data Sources: PubMed search of the English‐language literature from January 1982 to August 2007 combined with manual review of citations within article bibliographies. Review Methods: A systematic review of the literature for the targeted objective was conducted. Citations acquired from the targeted search were filtered and primary articles were reviewed to abstract information including interventions and outcome measures. Articles were then assigned level‐of‐evidence grades as defined by the Oxford Centre for Evidence‐Based Medicine. Results: A total of 861 citations were generated and 291 abstracts were identified as potentially relevant articles. Of these abstracts, 82 articles merited full‐text review. A total of 44 articles met inclusion criteria. The majority of the studies were classified as level 4 evidence, and only two studies met level 2b criteria. There was considerable variation in the quality of the studies within the level 4 category. All articles generally supported the effectiveness of functional rhinoplasty techniques for treatment of nasal obstruction. Conclusions: There is substantial level 4 evidence to support the efficacy of modern‐day rhinoplasty techniques for treatment of nasal obstruction due to nasal valve collapse. More recent studies have incorporated validated patient‐reported outcome measures, with more rigorous statistical analysis. Future study design improvements include the use of comparison cohorts and incorporating standardized objective outcome measures.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.otohns.2008.02.007

Cites

51 of 51 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Rhee, J. S., Arganbright, J. M., McMullin, B. T., & Hannley, M.
Affiliations
Medical College of Wisconsin (US)
Corresponding author
Rhee, John S.
Venue
Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2008-07
Volume
139
Issue
1
Pages
10-20
ISSN
  • 0161-6439 (ISSN-L)
  • 0194-5998
  • 1097-6817
OpenAlex
W2041079209
Cited by
132
References
51
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 6
FWCI
0.85
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Otolaryngology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Nasal Surgery and Airway Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Otorhinolaryngology › Sinusitis and nasal conditions
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Cleft Lip and Palate Research
Keywords
functional rhinoplasty, nasal valve collapse, nasal obstruction, patient-reported outcome measures, study quality
MeSH terms
Rhinoplasty, Nasal Obstruction, Treatment Outcome, Evidence-Based Medicine

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review