Cited by 45Climate Change and Health ImpactsClimate Change Communication and PerceptionCOVID-19 and Mental Health

Policy brief on climate change and mental health/well-being

Open access
Liu, Jianghong, Potter, Teddie, Zahner, Susan·2020·Nursing Outlook

Abstract

Climate change has a significant global impact on individuals' mental health and well-being. However, global health systems are inadequately prepared to address this issue. Studies indicate that climate events such as floods, droughts, tornados, earthquakes, and fires not only exacerbate chronic mental illness, but also impact well-being causing anxiety, stress, and in the worst case, suicide. The World Health Organization estimates that 12.6 million preventable deaths per year can be attributed to environmental factors, all of which are exacerbated by climate change, and an additional 250,000 deaths per year are projected between 2030 and 2050. Nurses must advocate for research, education, and policies that support disaster-resilient infrastructure and human services that allow communities across the globe to effectively mitigate the impact of climate change on human health.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.outlook.2020.06.003

Cites

33 of 33 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Various health professionals have already outlined ways to address mental health problems related to climate change within clinical practice and broader policy.

    “Various health professionals, including nurses [108], emergency department clinicians [109,110], clinical psychologists, and psychiatrists [111,112], have already outlined ways to address mental health problems related to climate change within clinical practice and broader policy, highlighting the strong willingness to act in the medical community.”

    From Climate Change and Mental Health: A Scoping Review (2021) · cites this paper as [110]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Liu, J., Potter, T., & Zahner, S.
Affiliations
University of Pennsylvania (US)
Corresponding author
Liu, Jianghong
Venue
Nursing Outlook
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2020-07
Volume
68
Issue
4
Pages
517-522
ISSN
0029-6554 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3083150439
Cited by
44
References
33
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 5
FWCI
1.80
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nursing Outlook (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Climate Change and Health Impacts
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Climate Change Communication and Perception
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › COVID-19 and Mental Health
Keywords
climate change, mental health, well-being, climate-related disasters, anxiety, stress, suicide, chronic mental illness, disaster resilience, health policy, nursing advocacy, environmental health
MeSH terms
Adult, Mental Disorders, Female, Health Promotion, Health Status, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Nursing Staff, Stress, Psychological, United States, Nurse's Role, Climate Change, Environmental Policy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review