Cited by 2,716Climate Change Policy and EconomicsSustainability and Climate Change GovernanceClimate variability and models

A new scenario framework for climate change research: the concept of shared socioeconomic pathways

Open access
O’Neill, Brian C., Kriegler, Elmar, Riahi, Keywan, Ebi, Kristie L., Hallegatte, Stephane, Carter, Timothy R., Mathur, Ritu, van Vuuren, Detlef P.·2014·Climatic Change

Abstract

The new scenario framework for climate change research envisions combining pathways of future radiative forcing and their associated climate changes with alternative pathways of socioeconomic development in order to carry out research on climate change impacts, adaptation, and mitigation. Here we propose a conceptual framework for how to define and develop a set of Shared Socioeconomic Pathways (SSPs) for use within the scenario framework. We define SSPs as reference pathways describing plausible alternative trends in the evolution of society and ecosystems over a century timescale, in the absence of climate change or climate policies. We introduce the concept of a space of challenges to adaptation and to mitigation that should be spanned by the SSPs, and discuss how particular trends in social, economic, and environmental development could be combined to produce such outcomes. A comparison to the narratives from the scenarios developed in the Special Report on Emissions Scenarios (SRES) illustrates how a starting point for developing SSPs can be defined. We suggest initial development of a set of basic SSPs that could then be extended to meet more specific purposes, and envision a process of application of basic and extended SSPs that would be iterative and potentially lead to modification of the original SSPs themselves.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10584-013-0905-2

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The Shared Socioeconomic Pathways are tacitly founded on the assumption that the future will be devoid of economic growth distortions, political instability, and armed conflict.

    “the Shared Socioeconomic Pathways, which are widely used in climate change impact assessments to explore societal implications of alternative climate change and development trajectories (186-188), are tacitly founded on the assumption that the future will be devoid of economic growth distortions, political instability, and armed conflict.”

    From Vicious Circles: Violence, Vulnerability, and Climate Change (2021) · cites this paper as [188]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
O’Neill, B. C., Kriegler, E., Riahi, K., Ebi, K. L., Hallegatte, S., Carter, T. R., Mathur, R., & van Vuuren, D. P.
Affiliations
  • NSF National Center for Atmospheric Research (US)
  • Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research (DE)
  • International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis (AT)
  • Finnish Environment Institute (FI)
  • TERI University (IN)
Corresponding author
O’Neill, Brian C.
Venue
Climatic Change
Published
2013-10-15
Volume
122
Issue
3
Pages
387-400
ISSN
  • 0165-0009 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-1480
OpenAlex
W1964308073
Cited by
2,716
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 203 · 2025: 278 · 2024: 293 · 2023: 311 · 2022: 335 · 2021: 324 · 2020: 231 · 2019: 187 · 2018: 186 · 2017: 121 · 2016: 118 · 2015: 84 · 2014: 32 · 2013: 12 · 2012: 1
FWCI
192.49
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Climatic Change (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • Utrecht University Repository (Utrecht University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • RENATE (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Publication Database PIK (Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research (PIK)) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • IIASA PURE (International Institute of Applied Systems Analysis) (submittedVersion)
  • RENATE (cc-by)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Climate Change Policy and Economics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Sustainability and Climate Change Governance
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Climate variability and models
Keywords
Shared Socioeconomic Pathways, climate change scenarios, climate change adaptation, climate change mitigation, skeletal-related events, conceptual framework

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review