CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 166

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Individual differences in decision-making

Franken, Ingmar H.A., Muris, Peter·2005·Personality and Individual Differences
DOI 10.1016/j.paid.2005.04.004
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.paid.2005.04.004

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 25

  1. Bechara, 2000, Characterization of the decision-making deficit of patients with ventromedial prefrontal cortex lesions, Brain, 123, 2189, 10.1093/brain/123.11.2189 · DOI
  2. Berridge, 2004, Motivation concepts in behavioral neuroscience, Physiology & Behavior, 81, 179, 10.1016/j.physbeh.2004.02.004 · DOI · Paper page
  3. Berridge, 2003, What is an unconscious emotion: the case for unconscious ‘liking’, Cognition and Emotion, 17, 181, 10.1080/02699930302289 · DOI
  4. Bowman, 2004, Emotion-based learning on a simplified card game: the Iowa and Bangor gambling tasks, Brain and Cognition, 55, 277, 10.1016/j.bandc.2004.02.009 · DOI
  5. Cabanac, 1992, Pleasure: the common currency, Journal of Theoretical Biology, 155, 173, 10.1016/S0022-5193(05)80594-6 · DOI · Paper page
  6. Carver, 1994, Behavioral inhibition, behavioral activation, and affective responses to impending reward and punishment: the BIS/BAS scales, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 319, 10.1037/0022-3514.67.2.319 · DOI · Paper page
  7. Claes, 2000, Psychometric properties of the Dickman Impulsivity Inventory, Personality and Individual Differences, 29, 27, 10.1016/S0191-8869(99)00172-5 · DOI
  8. Cohen, 2002, Reward and decision, Neuron, 36, 193, 10.1016/S0896-6273(02)00973-X · DOI
  9. Crone, 2003, Decision-making in disinhibited adolescents and adults: insensitivity to future consequences or driven by immediate reward?, Personality and Individual Differences, 35, 1625, 10.1016/S0191-8869(02)00386-0 · DOI
  10. Dickman, 1990, Functional and dysfunctional impulsivity: personality and cognitive correlates, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58, 95, 10.1037/0022-3514.58.1.95 · DOI
  11. Epstein, 1979, The stability of behavior: I. On predicting most of the people much of the time, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 1097, 10.1037/0022-3514.37.7.1097 · DOI · Paper page
  12. Epstein, 1980, The stability of behavior: II. Implications for psychological research, American Psychologist, 35, 790, 10.1037/0003-066X.35.9.790 · DOI
  13. Evans, 2004, Paradoxical effects of education on the Iowa gambling task, Brain and Cognition, 54, 240, 10.1016/j.bandc.2004.02.022 · DOI
  14. Franken, 2002, Behavioral approach system (BAS) sensitivity predicts alcohol craving, Personality and Individual Differences, 32, 349, 10.1016/S0191-8869(01)00030-7 · DOI
  15. Franken, 2005, Psychometric properties of the Dutch BIS/BAS Scales, Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment, 27, 25, 10.1007/s10862-005-3262-2 · DOI
  16. Gray, 1970, The psychophysiological basis of introversion–extraversion, Behaviour Research and Therapy, 8, 249, 10.1016/0005-7967(70)90069-0 · DOI · Paper page
  17. Krawczyk, 2002, Contributions of the prefrontal cortex to the neural basis of human decision-making, Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Review, 26, 631, 10.1016/S0149-7634(02)00021-0 · DOI
  18. Mavaddat, 2000, Deficits in decision-making in patients with aneurysms of the anterior communicating artery, Brain, 123, 2109, 10.1093/brain/123.10.2109 · DOI
  19. Quilty, 2004, The assessment of behavioural activation: the relationship between impulsivity and behavioural activation, Personality and Individual Differences, 37, 429, 10.1016/j.paid.2003.09.014 · DOI
  20. Rahman, 2001, Decision-making and neuropsychiatry, Trends in Cognitive Science, 5, 271, 10.1016/S1364-6613(00)01650-8 · DOI
  21. Rogers, 1999, Choosing between small, likely rewards and large, unlikely rewards activates inferior and orbital prefrontal cortex, Journal of Neuroscience, 19, 9029, 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.19-20-09029.1999 · DOI
  22. Tuinstra, 2000, Reliability, validity and structure of the adolescent decision making questionnaire among adolescents in The Netherlands, Personality and Individual Differences, 28, 273, 10.1016/S0191-8869(99)00096-3 · DOI
  23. Van Honk, 2002, Defective somatic markers in sub-clinical psychopathy, Neuroreport, 13, 1025, 10.1097/00001756-200206120-00009 · DOI
  24. Winkielman, 2003, Irrational wanting and sub-rational liking: how rudimentary motivational and affective processes shape preferences and choices, Political Psychology, 24, 10.1046/j.1467-9221.2003.00346.x · DOI
  25. Zuckerman, 1978, Sensation seeking in England and America: cross-cultural, age, and sex comparisons, Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 46, 139, 10.1037/0022-006X.46.1.139 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 166

Metadata

Authors
Franken, I. H. A., & Muris, P.
Venue
Personality and Individual Differences
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2005-10
Volume
39
Issue
5
Pages
991-998
ISSN
0191-8869
DOI
10.1016/j.paid.2005.04.004
Cited by
166
References
5
Language
en
Licence
www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review