Cited by 190Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic ControlPsychosomatic Disorders and Their TreatmentsNeural and Behavioral Psychology Studies

Enhanced cardiac perception is associated with benefits in decision‐making

Werner, Natalie S., Jung, Katharina, Duschek, Stefan, Schandry, Rainer·2009·Psychophysiology

Abstract

In the present study we provide the first empirical evidence that viscero-sensory feedback from an internal organ is associated with decision-making processes. Participants with accurate vs. poor perception of their heart activity were compared with regard to their performance in the Iowa Gambling Task. During this task, participants have to choose between four card decks. Decks A and B yield high gains and high losses, and if played continuously, result in net loss. In contrast, decks C and D yield small gains and also small losses, but result in net profit if they are selected continuously. Accordingly, participants have to learn to avoid the net loss options in favor of the net gain options. In our study, participants with good cardiac perception chose significantly more of the net gain and fewer of the net loss options. Our findings document the substantial role of visceral feedback in decision-making processes in complex situations.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1469-8986.2009.00855.x

Cites

54 of 54 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Higher scores on the heartbeat counting task predict better performance on the Iowa Gambling Task.

    “Werner, Jung, Duschek, and Schandry (2009), who found that higher scores on the heartbeat counting task predicted better performance on the Iowa Gambling Task”

    From Atypical interoception as a common risk factor for psychopathology: A review (2021) · cites this paper as Werner, Jung, Duschek, and Schandry (2009)

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Werner, N. S., Jung, K., Duschek, S., & Schandry, R.
Affiliations
Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München (DE)
Corresponding author
Werner, Natalie S.
Venue
Psychophysiology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2009-10-12
Volume
46
Issue
6
Pages
1123-1129
ISSN
  • 0048-5772 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-8986
OpenAlex
W2093040494
Cited by
189
References
54
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 26 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 14 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 6
FWCI
1.94
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Psychophysiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
Keywords
heart rate, decision-making, Iowa Gambling Task, risk assessment, emotional valence
MeSH terms
Adult, Anxiety, Data Interpretation, Statistical, Decision Making, Electrocardiography, Female, Gambling, Heart, Heart Rate, Humans, Male, Personality, Self Concept, Young Adult, Executive Function

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review