Cited by 57Personality Traits and PsychologyPsychological Testing and AssessmentPsychometric Methodologies and Testing

Heritability and nineteen-year stability of long and short EPQ-R Neuroticism scales

Birley, Andrew J., Gillespie, Nathan A., Heath, Andrew C., Sullivan, Patrick F., Boomsma, Dorret I., Martin, Nicholas G.·2006·Personality and Individual Differences

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.paid.2005.09.005

Cites

23 of 23 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 25 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Birley, A. J., Gillespie, N. A., Heath, A. C., Sullivan, P. F., Boomsma, D. I., & Martin, N. G.
Affiliations
  • QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute (AU)
  • Virginia Commonwealth University (US)
  • Washington University in St. Louis (US)
  • University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US)
  • Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam (NL)
Corresponding author
Birley, Andrew J.
Venue
Personality and Individual Differences
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2006-03
Volume
40
Issue
4
Pages
737-747
ISSN
0191-8869 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2043822013
Cited by
55
References
25
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 5
FWCI
4.01
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Personality and Individual Differences (publishedVersion)
  • Digital Academic REpository of VU University Amsterdam (Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam) (submittedVersion)
  • VU Research Portal (submittedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Health and Medical Research Council
  • National Medical Research Council
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Traits and Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Psychological Testing and Assessment
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
Keywords
heritability, neuroticism, Eysenck Personality Questionnaire-Revised, longitudinal stability, personality assessment

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review