Cited by 19Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesPsychosomatic Disorders and Their TreatmentsChild and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development

Anxiety disorder specificity of anxiety sensitivity in a community sample of young women

Open access
McWilliams, Lachlan A., Becker, Eni S., Margraf, Jürgen, Clara, Ian P., Vriends, Noortje·2007·Personality and Individual Differences

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.paid.2006.07.016

Cites

38 of 38 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Two studies reported no significant relationship between scores on OCD measures (as rated by all patients, not just patients with OCD) and ASI.

    “Two reported no significant relationship between scores on OCD measures (as rated by all patients, not just patients with OCD) and ASI”

    From Emotion and internal experience in Obsessive Compulsive Disorder: Reviewing the role of alexithymia, anxiety sensitivity and distress tolerance (2014) · cites this paper as McWilliams, Becker, Margraf, Clara, & Vriends, 2007

    The Results report no statistically significant association between elevated total anxiety sensitivity and OCD diagnosis, and Table 2 shows a nonsignificant OCD odds ratio for total ASI. But this study used diagnostic interviews in a community sample of young women, not OCD-measure scores rated by a sample of patients; it therefore does not support that part of the claim. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 40 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Keller, A. (2000). Die Klassifikation Psychischer Sto ¨rungen nach DSM-IV mit Hilfe eines strukturierten Diagnostis- chen Interviews (F-DIPS). Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Ruprecht-Karls-University of Heidelberg, Germany.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
McWilliams, L. A., Becker, E. S., Margraf, J., Clara, I. P., & Vriends, N.
Affiliations
  • Acadia University (CA)
  • Radboud University Nijmegen (NL)
  • University of Basel (CH)
  • University of Manitoba (CA)
Corresponding author
McWilliams, Lachlan A.
Venue
Personality and Individual Differences
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2007-01
Volume
42
Issue
2
Pages
345-354
ISSN
0191-8869 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2103779727
Cited by
19
References
40
Citations by year
2022: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 1
FWCI
2.52
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Personality and Individual Differences (publishedVersion)
  • edoc (University of Basel) (acceptedVersion)
  • Radboud Repository (Radboud University) (submittedVersion)
  • edoc (University of Basel)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
Keywords
anxiety sensitivity, specificity hypothesis, panic disorder, anxiety disorders, major depressive disorder, dysthymia, neuroticism, young women, community sample, physical concerns, social problems, vulnerability factors

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review