Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 448

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 10 of the 10 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Measuring happiness: The higher order factor structure of subjective and psychological well-being measures

Linley, P. Alex, Maltby, John, Wood, Alex M., Osborne, Gabrielle, Hurling, Robert·2009·Personality and Individual Differences
DOI 10.1016/j.paid.2009.07.010
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.paid.2009.07.010

Cites

10 of 10 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 10

  1. Biaobin, 2004, SWB and PWB: The distinction and integration of two well-being research orientations, Psychological Science (China), 27, 836
  2. Byrne, 2004, Testing for multigroup invariance using AMOS graphics: A road less traveled, Structural Equation Modeling, 11, 272, 10.1207/s15328007sem1102_8 · DOI · Paper page
  3. Christopher, 1999, Situating psychological well-being: Exploring the cultural roots of its theory and research, Journal of Counseling and Development, 77, 141, 10.1002/j.1556-6676.1999.tb02434.x · DOI · Paper page
  4. Govindji, 2007, Strengths use, self-concordance and well-being: Implications for strengths coaching and coaching psychologists, International Coaching Psychology Review, 2, 143, 10.53841/bpsicpr.2007.2.2.143 · DOI · Paper page
  5. King, 2006, Positive affect and the experience of meaning in life, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90, 179, 10.1037/0022-3514.90.1.179 · DOI · Paper page
  6. Samman, E. (2007). Psychological and subjective well-being: A proposal for internationally comparable indicators. OHPI Working Paper Series, University of Oxford. · DOI
  7. van Dierendonck, 2004, The construct validity of Ryff’s Scales of Psychological Well-being and its extension with spiritual well-being, Personality and Individual Differences, 36, 629, 10.1016/S0191-8869(03)00122-3 · DOI · Paper page
  8. Velicer, 2000, Construct explication through factor or component analysis: A review and evaluation of alternative procedures for determining the number of factors or components
  9. Waterman, 2008, Reconsidering happiness: A eudaimonist’s perspective, Journal of Positive Psychology, 3, 234, 10.1080/17439760802303002 · DOI · Paper page
  10. Zwick, 1986, Comparison of five rules for determining the number of components to retain, Psychological Bulletin, 99, 432, 10.1037/0033-2909.99.3.432 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

See all 448

Metadata

Authors
Linley, P. A., Maltby, J., Wood, A. M., Osborne, G., & Hurling, R.
Venue
Personality and Individual Differences
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2009-12
Volume
47
Issue
8
Pages
878-884
ISSN
0191-8869 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1016/j.paid.2009.07.010
OpenAlex
W2156723289
Cited by
448
References
10
FWCI
18.54
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.