Cited by 266Eating Disorders and BehaviorsBody Image and Dysmorphia StudiesPsychological Testing and Assessment

Body image assessment: a review of figural drawing scales

Gardner, Rick M., Brown, Dana L.·2010·Personality and Individual Differences

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.paid.2009.08.017

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Gardner, R. M., & Brown, D. L.
Affiliations
University of Colorado Denver (US)
Corresponding author
Gardner, Rick M.
Venue
Personality and Individual Differences
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2010-01
Volume
48
Issue
2
Pages
107-111
ISSN
0191-8869 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2002679347
Cited by
266
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 40 · 2021: 19 · 2020: 23 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 22 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 14 · 2014: 23 · 2013: 17 · 2012: 16
FWCI
9.54
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Personality and Individual Differences (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Eating Disorders and Behaviors
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Body Image and Dysmorphia Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Psychological Testing and Assessment
Keywords
body image, body image disturbance, scale reliability, scale validity, scale selection, body image assessment

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review