The DOI matches its Crossref record; 26 of the 26 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Disgust: A predictor of social conservatism and prejudicial attitudes toward homosexuals
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“It has also been linked to divinity/purity; as such, the emotion is a reaction to a perceived violation of a divinity code, e.g., purity, sanctity, or the sacred (Terrizzi et al., 2010).”
From “Real men in the battlefield”: a hybrid AI–discourse analysis of online homophobia and transphobia (2026) · cites this paper as Terrizzi et al., 2010
In the citing paper
“However, the emotion of disgust has been found especially relevant to prejudice toward lesbians and gay men (Haidt and Hersh, 2001; Inbar et al., 2009; Terrizzi et al., 2010).”
From “Real men in the battlefield”: a hybrid AI–discourse analysis of online homophobia and transphobia (2026) · cites this paper as Terrizzi et al., 2010
Citations
Cites
Multiple regression: testing and interpreting interactions
(1992) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.29-3352 · Cited by 36,647
Two-component models of socially desirable responding.
Paulhus, D. L. (1984) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.46.3.598 · Cited by 3,013
Haidt, J., McCauley, C., & Rozin, P. (1994) · Personality and Individual Differences · doi:10.1016/0191-8869(94)90212-7 · Cited by 1,632
Enemies of freedom: understanding right-wing authoritarianism
(1989) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.26-3934 · Cited by 1,558
Authoritarianism, Religious Fundamentalism, Quest, and Prejudice
Altemeyer, B., & Hunsberger, B. E. (1992) · International Journal for the Psychology of Religion · doi:10.1207/s15327582ijpr0202_5 · Cited by 1,276
Evolved disease-avoidance mechanisms and contemporary xenophobic attitudes
Faulkner, J., Schaller, M., Park, J. H., & Duncan, L. A. (2004) · Group Processes & Intergroup Relations · doi:10.1177/1368430204046142 · Cited by 845
Duckitt, J. H. (2006) · Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin · doi:10.1177/0146167205284282 · Cited by 660
The Expression of Emotion in Man and Animals
Darwin, C. D. (2020) · Cited by 649
Schaller, M., & Murray, D. R. (2008) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.95.1.212 · Cited by 647
Dirt, Disgust, and Disease: Is Hygiene in Our Genes?
Curtis, V. A., & Biran, A. (2001) · Perspectives in biology and medicine · doi:10.1353/pbm.2001.0001 · Cited by 643
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- Schaller, 2006, Parasites, behavioral defenses, and the social psychological mechanisms through which cultures are evoked, Psychological Inquiry, 17, 96
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Differences in negativity bias underlie variations in political ideology
Hibbing, J. R., Smith, K. B., & Alford, J. R. (2014) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x13001192 · Cited by 649
Political ideology as motivated social cognition: Behavioral and neuroscientific evidence
Jost, J. T., & Amodio, D. M. (2011) · Motivation and Emotion · doi:10.1007/s11031-011-9260-7 · Cited by 419
The behavioral immune system and social conservatism: a meta-analysis
Terrizzi, J. A., Shook, N. J., & McDaniel, M. A. (2012) · Evolution and Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2012.10.003 · Cited by 403
Disgust Sensitivity, Political Conservatism, and Voting
Inbar, Y., Pizarro, D., Iyer, R., & Haidt, J. (2012) · Social Psychological and Personality Science · doi:10.1177/1948550611429024 · Cited by 358
Murray, D. R., & Schaller, M. (2016) · Advances in Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/bs.aesp.2015.09.002 · Cited by 282
Metadata
- Authors
- Terrizzi, J. A., Shook, N. J., & Ventis, W. L.
- Affiliations
- Virginia Commonwealth University (US)
- William & Mary (US)
- Corresponding author
- Terrizzi, John A.
- ORCID
- Shook, Natalie J.
- Venue
- Personality and Individual Differences
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2010-10
- Volume
- 49
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 587-592
- ISSN
- 0191-8869 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2014957841
- Cited by
- 286
- References
- 26
- Citations by year
- 2026: 9 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 27 · 2020: 36 · 2019: 19 · 2018: 19 · 2017: 28 · 2016: 23 · 2015: 26 · 2014: 25 · 2013: 12 · 2012: 9
- FWCI
- 4.81
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Personality and Individual Differences (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Death Anxiety and Social Exclusion
- Keywords
- disgust, social conservatism, behavioral immune system, disgust sensitivity, intergroup attitudes, outgroup attitudes, contamination prevention
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
