Cited by 358Psychology of Moral and Emotional JudgmentSocial and Intergroup PsychologyEvolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior

Disgust Sensitivity, Political Conservatism, and Voting

Inbar, Yoel, Pizarro, David, Iyer, Ravi, Haidt, Jonathan·2012·Social Psychological and Personality Science

Abstract

In two large samples (combined N = 31,045), we found a positive relationship between disgust sensitivity and political conservatism. This relationship held when controlling for a number of demographic variables as well as the “Big Five” personality traits. Disgust sensitivity was also associated with more conservative voting in the 2008 U.S. presidential election. In Study 2, we replicated the disgust sensitivity–conservatism relationship in an international sample of respondents from 121 different countries. Across both samples, contamination disgust, which reflects a heightened concern with interpersonally transmitted disease and pathogens, was most strongly associated with conservatism.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/1948550611429024

Cites

37 of 37 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Moral emotions may be tied specifically to behavior relevant to morality and politics, including judgments of responsibility and voting.

    “Importantly, moral emotions may also be tied specifically to behavior that is relevant to morality and politics, including judgments of responsibility and voting (13,14).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Inbar, Y., Pizarro, D., Iyer, R., & Haidt, J.
Affiliations
  • Tilburg University (NL)
  • Cornell University (US)
  • University of Southern California (US)
  • University of Virginia (US)
Corresponding author
Inbar, Yoel
Venue
Social Psychological and Personality Science
Published
2011-12-06
Volume
3
Issue
5
Pages
537-544
ISSN
  • 1948-5506 (ISSN-L)
  • 1948-5514
OpenAlex
W2126305164
Cited by
358
References
37
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 27 · 2023: 21 · 2022: 22 · 2021: 40 · 2020: 41 · 2019: 31 · 2018: 23 · 2017: 35 · 2016: 20 · 2015: 27 · 2014: 32 · 2013: 13 · 2012: 9
FWCI
8.66
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Social Psychological and Personality Science (publishedVersion)
  • Research portal (Tilburg University) (publishedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior
Keywords
disgust sensitivity, political conservatism, voting behavior, 2008 presidential election, Big Five personality traits, cross-national replication

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review