Cited by 104Substance Abuse Treatment and OutcomesPosttraumatic Stress Disorder ResearchResilience and Mental Health

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 33 of the 33 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Impulsivity and alcohol use coping motives in a trauma-exposed sample: The mediating role of distress tolerance

Open access
Marshall-Berenz, Erin C., Vujanovic, Anka A., MacPherson, Laura·2011·Personality and Individual Differences

Abstract

The present investigation examined the mediating role of distress tolerance in the association between impulsivity and alcohol use coping motives among trauma-exposed individuals. Participants were 86 adults (64.3% women; M(age) = 23.4, SD = 9.3) who met the DSM-IV-TR posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) criterion A for at least one traumatic life event and endorsed alcohol use in the past month. Distress tolerance at least partially mediated the association between impulsivity and alcohol use coping motives, after controlling for the variance explained by PTSD symptom severity and alcohol use problems. Clinical implications and future directions related to this line of inquiry are presented and discussed.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.paid.2010.11.033

Cites

33 of 33 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 32 references

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 104

Metadata

Authors
Marshall-Berenz, E. C., Vujanovic, A. A., & MacPherson, L.
Affiliations
  • Boston University (US)
  • University of Maryland, College Park (US)
Venue
Personality and Individual Differences
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2011-04
Volume
50
Issue
5
Pages
588-592
ISSN
0191-8869 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1966120961
Cited by
104
References
32
Citations by year
2025: 5 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 2
FWCI
1.87
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Personality and Individual Differences (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Mental Health (F31MH080453)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Resilience and Mental Health
Keywords
impulsivity, alcohol consumption, coping motives, distress tolerance, post-traumatic stress disorder, trauma exposure, mediation, alcohol use problems, PTSD symptom severity

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review