Cited by 104International Student and Expatriate ChallengesCultural Differences and ValuesSocial and Intergroup Psychology

Assessing the predictive validity of cultural intelligence over time

Ward, Colleen, Wilson, Jessie, Fischer, Ronald·2011·Personality and Individual Differences

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.paid.2011.03.032

Cites

37 of 37 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 38 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ward, C., Wilson, J., & Fischer, R.
Affiliations
Victoria University of Wellington (NZ)
Corresponding author
Ward, Colleen
Venue
Personality and Individual Differences
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2011-07
Volume
51
Issue
2
Pages
138-142
ISSN
0191-8869 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1967340299
Cited by
104
References
38
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 14 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 2
FWCI
20.16
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Personality and Individual Differences (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Communication › International Student and Expatriate Challenges
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Cultural Differences and Values
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
Keywords
cultural intelligence, motivational cultural intelligence, cross-cultural adaptation (acculturation), international students, psychological symptoms, region of origin, student orientation programs, predictive validity, motivation theories

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review