The engageable personality: Personality and trait EI as predictors of work engagement
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Trait EI correlates with work engagement.
“Finally, trait EI also correlates with organizational variables of broader significance, such as entrepreneurial behaviors (Ahmetoglu, Leutner, & Chamorro-Premuzic, 2011), work engagement (Akhtar, Boustani, Tsivrikos, & Chamorro-Premuzic, 2015), and counterproductive work behaviors (Jung & Yoon, 2012).”
From Developments in Trait Emotional Intelligence Research (2016) · cites this paper as Akhtar, Boustani, Tsivrikos, & Chamorro-Premuzic, 2015
Cites
Salovey, P., & Mayer, J. D. (1990) · Imagination, Cognition and Personality · doi:10.2190/dugg-p24e-52wk-6cdg · Cited by 10,484 · see citing works
Job demands, job resources, and their relationship with burnout and engagement: a multi‐sample study
Schaufeli, W. B., & Bakker, A. B. (2004) · Journal of Organizational Behavior · doi:10.1002/job.248 · Cited by 9,297 · see citing works
A very brief measure of the Big-Five personality domains
Gosling, S. D., Rentfrow, P. J., & Swann, W. B. (2003) · Journal of Research in Personality · doi:10.1016/s0092-6566(03)00046-1 · Cited by 8,307 · see citing works
Antecedents and consequences of employee engagement
Saks, A. M. (2006) · Journal of Managerial Psychology · doi:10.1108/02683940610690169 · Cited by 5,577 · see citing works
Work engagement: An emerging concept in occupational health psychology
Bakker, A. B., Schaufeli, W. B., Leiter, M. P., & Taris, T. W. (2008) · Work & Stress · doi:10.1080/02678370802393649 · Cited by 2,496 · see citing works
Halbesleben, J. R. B., Harvey, J., & Bolino, M. C. (2009) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0017595 · Cited by 701 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Developments in Trait Emotional Intelligence Research
Petrides, K. V., Mikolajczak, M., Mavroveli, S., Sanchez-Ruiz, M.-J., Furnham, A., & Pérez-González, J.-C. (2016) · Emotion Review · doi:10.1177/1754073916650493 · Cited by 564 · see citing works
Liu, J., Cho, S., & Putra, E. D. (2017) · International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management · doi:10.1108/ijchm-10-2015-0539 · Cited by 77 · see citing works
- Authors
- Akhtar, R., Boustani, L., Tsivrikos, D., & Chamorro-Premuzic, T.
- Affiliations
- University College London (GB)
- Venue
- Personality and Individual Differences
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2015-01
- Volume
- 73
- Pages
- 44-49
- ISSN
- 0191-8869 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2082418941
- Cited by
- 185
- References
- 6
- Citations by year
- 2026: 6 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 19 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 19 · 2020: 25 · 2019: 24 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 15 · 2015: 6
- FWCI
- 26.39
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Personality and Individual Differences (publishedVersion)
- UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Emotional Intelligence and Performance
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Traits and Psychology
- Keywords
- work engagement, trait emotional intelligence, Big Five personality traits, openness to experience, interpersonal sensitivity, ambition, extraversion, conscientiousness, adjustment
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review