Cited by 74Optimism, Hope, and Well-beingPsychological Well-being and Life SatisfactionPsychological and Temporal Perspectives Research

Locus-of-hope and life satisfaction: The mediating roles of personal self-esteem and relational self-esteem

Du, Hongfei, Bernardo, Allan B.I., Yeung, Susanna S.·2015·Personality and Individual Differences

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.paid.2015.04.026

Cites

38 of 38 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Authors
Du, H., Bernardo, A. B. I., & Yeung, S. S.
Affiliations
  • University of Macau (MO)
  • Education University of Hong Kong (HK)
Corresponding author
Du, Hongfei
Venue
Personality and Individual Differences
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2015-09
Volume
83
Pages
228-233
ISSN
0191-8869 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1970153463
Cited by
74
References
38
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 5
FWCI
14.11
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Personality and Individual Differences (publishedVersion)
Funders
University of Macau (SRG014-FSH13-ABIB)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Optimism, Hope, and Well-being
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Psychological and Temporal Perspectives Research
Keywords
life satisfaction, self-esteem, hope, psychological well-being, mediating effect, university students

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review