Cited by 52Personality Traits and PsychologyPsychometric Methodologies and TestingCultural Differences and Values

The development and validation of the Relational Self-esteem Scale

DU, HONGFEI, KING, RONNEL B., CHI, PEILIAN·2012·Scandinavian Journal of Psychology

Abstract

According to the tripartite model of the self (Brewer & Gardner, 1996), the self consists of three aspects: personal, relational, and collective. Correspondingly, individuals can achieve a sense of self-worth through their personal attributes (personal self-esteem), relationship with significant others (relational self-esteem), or social group membership (collective self-esteem). Existing measures on personal and collective self-esteem are available in the literature; however, no scale exists that assesses relational self-esteem. The authors developed a scale to measure individual differences in relational self-esteem and tested it with two samples of Chinese university students. Between and within-network approaches to construct validation were used. The scale showed adequate internal consistency reliability and results of the confirmatory factor analysis showed good fit. It also exhibited meaningful correlations with theoretically relevant constructs in the nomological network. Implications and directions for future research are discussed.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1467-9450.2012.00946.x

Cites

49 of 49 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
DU, H., KING, R. B., & CHI, P.
Affiliations
University of Hong Kong (HK)
Corresponding author
DU, HONGFEI
Venue
Scandinavian Journal of Psychology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2012-03-30
Volume
53
Issue
3
Pages
258-264
ISSN
  • 0036-5564 (ISSN-L)
  • 1467-9450
OpenAlex
W1897434686
Cited by
52
References
46
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 1
FWCI
5.45
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Scandinavian Journal of Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Traits and Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Cultural Differences and Values
Keywords
self-esteem, scale development, scale validation, Chinese university students, collective self-esteem, nomological network
MeSH terms
Achievement, Adolescent, Adult, Factor Analysis, Statistical, Female, Humans, Interpersonal Relations, Male, Surveys and Questionnaires, Self Concept, Reproducibility of Results

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review