Cited by 43Emotions and Moral BehaviorSubstance Abuse Treatment and OutcomesAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes

Shame is bad and guilt is good: An examination of the impaired control over drinking pathway to alcohol use and related problems

Open access
Patock-Peckham, Julie A., Canning, Jessica R., Leeman, Robert F.·2018·Personality and Individual Differences

Abstract

Tension Reduction Theory (Kushner et al., 1994) suggests alcohol is used as a means to alleviate negative affect (NA) such as shame and guilt. Shame is an internalized response in which blame is placed on the self, while guilt is not internalized and the blame is placed on the situation (Dearing et al., 2005). This study aims to investigate relationships of shame and guilt to alcohol use and problems through the mechanisms of multiple facets of impulsivity (i.e. UPPS) and impaired control over drinking (IC), which reflect behavioral control processes. The sample consisted of 419 college students (53% female). We examined direct and indirect relationships of shame and guilt on alcohol use and related problems through facets of impulsivity and IC. Shame and guilt were found to diverge (Woien et al., 2003). We found that those higher on shame-proneness used more alcohol and experienced more alcohol-related problems through increased negative urgency and IC. Conversely, guilt-prone individuals used less alcohol and experienced fewer alcohol-related problems through less negative urgency and IC. Our findings suggest that guilt is an adaptive form of negative affect, particularly when it comes to alcohol-related outcomes.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.paid.2017.09.023

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Impulsive aggression, particularly when expressed in socially inappropriate or uncontrolled ways, often elicits shame and guilt among perpetrators, contributing to negative self-concept and enduring perceptions of personal defectiveness.

    “Impulsive aggression, particularly when expressed in socially inappropriate or uncontrolled ways, often elicits shame and guilt among perpetrators (Griffin et al. 2016), contributing to negative self-concept and enduring perceptions of personal defectiveness (Dearing et al. 2005; Patock-Peckham et al. 2018; Luoma et al. 2019).”

    From Decoding the bidirectional links between alcohol misuse and aggression: toward a unified translational framework (2026) · cites this paper as Patock-Peckham et al. 2018

    The Introduction (page unavailable) describes shame as internalized negative feeling toward oneself, associated with feelings of inferiority and a desire to conceal deficiencies. That supports the negative-self-concept aspect of the clause attributed to this paper, but the copy does not establish enduring perceptions of defectiveness; it also distinguishes guilt as not internalized. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Structural equation modeling supports a pathway in which shame contributes to alcohol misuse through heightened negative urgency and impaired self-regulatory control.

    “Structural equation modeling supports a pathway in which shame contributes to alcohol misuse through heightened negative urgency and impaired self-regulatory control (Patock-Peckham et al. 2018).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 25

  1. Bentler PM 1990 Comparative fit indexes in structural models Psychological Bulletin 107 238 246 doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.107.2.238 2320703 · DOI · Paper page
  2. Carni S Petrocci N Miglio CD Mancini F Couyoumdjian A 2013 Intrapsychic and interpersonal guilt: a critical review of the recent literature Cognitive Processing 14 333 346 23732818
  3. Cohen AR Stotland E Wolfe DM 1955 An experimental investigation of need for cognition The Journal of Abnormal Social Psychology 51 291 294 13263045
  4. Dearing RL Stuewig J Tangney JP 2005 On the importance of distinguishing shame from guilt: Relations to problematic alcohol and drug use Addictive Behaviors 30 1392 1404 16022935 PMC3106346
  5. Depp CA Moore RC Dev SI Mausbach BT Eyler LT Granholm EL 2016 The temporal course and clinical correlated of subjective impulsivity in bipolar disorder as revealed through ecological momentary assessment Journal of Affective Disorders 193 145 150 26773907 PMC4915941
  6. Hancock GR Liu M 2012 Bootstrapping standard errors and data-model fit statistics in structural equation modeling Handbook of structural equation modeling Hoyle RH 296 306 New York The Gilford Press
  7. Heather N Tebbutt JS Mattick RP Zamir R 1993 Development of a scale for measuring impaired control over alcohol consumption: a preliminary report Journal of Studies on Alcohol 54 700 709 8271806
  8. Hittner JB Swickert RS 2006 Sensation seeking and alcohol use: A meta-analytic review Addictive Behaviors 31 1383 1401 16343793
  9. Jackson CJ 2011 How sensation seeking provides a common basis for functional and dysfunctional outcomes Journal of Research in Personality 45 29 36
  10. Jackson CJ Hobman EV Jimmieson NL Martin R 2009 Comapring different approach and avoidance models of learning and personality in the prediction of work, university, and leadership outcomes British Journal of Psychology 100 283 312 18627640
  11. Ketelaar T Au WT 2003 The effects of feelings of guilt on the behaviour of uncooperative individuals in repeated social bargaining games: An affect-as-information interpretation of the role of emotion in social interaction Cognition and Emotion 17 429 453 29715746
  12. Kushner MG Sher KJ Wood MD Wood PK 1994 Anxiety and drinking behavior: Moderating effects of tension-reduction alcohol outcome expectancies Alcoholism: Clinical and Experimental Research 18 852 860 7978095
  13. Langenbucher JW Chung T 1995 Onset and staging of DSM-IV alcohol dependence using mean age and survival-hazard methods Journal of Abnormal Psychology 104 346 7790636
  14. Leeman RF Beseler CL Helms CM Patock-Peckham JA Wakeling VA Kahler CW 2014 A brief, critical review of research on impaired control over alcohol use and suggestions for future studies Alcoholism: Clinical and Experimental Research 38 301 308 PMC3946792 24117468
  15. Leeman RF Patock-Peckham JA Potenza MN 2012 Impaired control over alcohol use: An under-addressed risk factor for problem drinking in young adults Experimental and Clincial Psychopharmacology 20 92 106 PMC3613490 22182417
  16. Leeman RF Toll BA Taylor LA Volpicelli JR 2009 Alcohol-induced disinhibition expectancies and impaired control as prospective predictors of problem drinking in undergraduates Psychology of Addictive Behaviors 23 553 20025361 PMC2805107
  17. MacKinnon DP 2008 Introduction to Statistical Mediation Analysis New York, NY: Taylor & Francis Group/ Lawrence Erlbaum Associates New York, NY
  18. Park CL Armeli S Tennen H 2004 The daily stress and coping process and alcohol use among college students Journal of Studies on Alcohol 65 126 135 15000512
  19. Park CL Cohen LH Herb L 1990 Intrinsic religiousness and religious coping as life stress moderators for Catholics versus Protestants Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 59 562 574 2231285
  20. Patock-Peckham JA Morgan-Lopez AA 2006 College drinking behaviors: Mediational links between parenting styles, impulse control, and alcohol-related outcomes Psychology of Addictive Behaviors 20 117 125 16784353
  21. Patock-Peckham JA Cheong J Balhorn ME Nagoshi CT 2001 A social learning perspective: A model of parenting styles, self-regulation, perceived drinking control, and alcohol use and problems Alcholism: Clinical and Experimental Research 25 1284 1292 11584147
  22. Rhea SA Nagoshi CT Wilson JR 1993 Reliability of sibling reports on parental drinking behaviors Journal of Studies on Alcohol 54 80 84 8355503
  23. Simons JS Gaher RM Oliver MNI Bush JA Palmer MA 2005 An experience sampling study of associations between affect and alcohol use and problems among college students Journal of Studies of Alcohol and Drugs 66 459 469 16240553
  24. Tangney JP 1992 Situational determinants of shame and guilt in young adulthood Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 18 199 206
  25. Wood MD Nagoshi CT Dennis DA 1992 Alcohol norms and expectations as predictors of alcohol use and problems in a college student sample The American Journal of Drug and Alcohol Abuse 18 461 476 1449125

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Patock-Peckham, J. A., Canning, J. R., & Leeman, R. F.
Affiliations
  • Arizona State University (US)
  • Yale University (US)
Venue
Personality and Individual Differences
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2018-01
Volume
121
Pages
62-66
ISSN
0191-8869 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2756656386
Cited by
43
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 1
FWCI
3.53
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Personality and Individual Differences (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • NIH (K01AA024160-01A1, FP11815)
  • Burton Family Foundation
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Emotions and Moral Behavior
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
Keywords
shame, guilt, alcohol consumption, alcohol-related problems, negative urgency, negative affect, university students, shame proneness, guilt proneness

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review