Cited by 57Cognitive Abilities and TestingPersonality Traits and PsychologyNeural and Behavioral Psychology Studies

Working memory and the Big Five

Open access
Waris, Otto, Soveri, Anna, Lukasik, Karolina M., Lehtonen, Minna, Laine, Matti·2018·Personality and Individual Differences

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.paid.2018.03.027

Cites

10 of 10 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Waris, O., Soveri, A., Lukasik, K. M., Lehtonen, M., & Laine, M.
Affiliations
Åbo Akademi University (FI)
Corresponding author
Waris, Otto
Venue
Personality and Individual Differences
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2018-08
Volume
130
Pages
26-35
ISSN
0191-8869 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2796437133
Cited by
57
References
10
Citations by year
2025: 4 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2020: 41 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 1
FWCI
15.06
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Personality and Individual Differences (publishedVersion)
  • Åbo Akademi University Research Portal (submittedVersion)
  • NORA - Norwegian Open Research Archives (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Funders
  • Academy of Finland (#260276)
  • Åbo Akademi University Endowment
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Abilities and Testing
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Traits and Psychology
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
Keywords
working memory, Big Five personality traits, conscientiousness, openness to experience, n-back task, visuospatial working memory, working memory updating

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review