Cited by 85Personality Traits and PsychologyCognitive Abilities and TestingPsychological Testing and Assessment

Personality traits prospectively predict verbal fluency in a lifespan sample.

Open access
Sutin, Angelina R., Terracciano, Antonio, Kitner-Triolo, Melissa H., Uda, Manuela, Schlessinger, David, Zonderman, Alan B.·2011·Psychology and Aging

Abstract

In a community-dwelling sample (N = 4,790; age range 14-94), we examined whether personality traits prospectively predicted performance on a verbal fluency task. Open, extraverted, and emotionally stable participants had better verbal fluency. At the facet level, dispositionally happy and self-disciplined participants retrieved more words; those prone to anxiety and depression and those who were deliberative retrieved fewer words. Education moderated the association between conscientiousness and fluency such that participants with lower education performed better on the fluency task if they were also conscientious. Age was not a moderator at the domain level, indicating that the personality-fluency associations were consistent across the life span. A disposition toward emotional vulnerability and being less open, less happy, and undisciplined may be detrimental to cognitive performance.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/a0024276

Cites

48 of 48 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Neuroticism was found to correlate with lower levels of verbal frequency, disfluencies, and incomplete sentences.

    “Neuroticism was found to correlate with lower levels of verbal frequency, disfluencies, and incomplete sentences (Gawda, 2007;Sutin et al., 2011).”

    From The Role of Personality in Language Learning (2026) · cites this paper as Sutin et al., 2011

    The Results report that participants high in Neuroticism had lower verbal fluency. The Method defines fluency as the number of unique animal names produced in 60 seconds; the paper does not report an association with disfluencies or incomplete sentences. It also does not measure verbal frequency as such. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Subjects with high levels of neuroticism present increased disfluencies and incomplete sentences.

    “whereas those with high levels of neuroticism present increased disfluencies and incomplete sentences (Gawda, 2007;Sutin et al., 2011).”

    From The Role of Personality in Language Learning (2026) · cites this paper as Sutin et al., 2011

    The Results report that participants high in Neuroticism had lower verbal fluency. But the Method (Verbal fluency; page unavailable) defines that measure as the number of unique animal names produced in 60 seconds, not disfluencies or incomplete sentences. The paper does not establish the specific speech patterns claimed. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. McEwen BS The neurobiology of stress: From serendipity to clinical relevance Brain Research 2000 886 172 189 11119695

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Sutin, A. R., Terracciano, A., Kitner-Triolo, M. H., Uda, M., Schlessinger, D., & Zonderman, A. B.
Affiliations
  • National Institutes of Health (US)
  • United States Department of Health and Human Services (US)
  • Institute of Genetic and Biomedical Research (IT)
Venue
Psychology and Aging
Published
2011
Volume
26
Issue
4
Pages
994-999
ISSN
  • 0882-7974 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-1498
OpenAlex
W2064308177
Cited by
84
References
48
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 5
FWCI
6.22
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Psychology and Aging (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (Z99 AG999999)
  • National Institute on Aging (R99 AG999999, ZIAAG000197, ZIAAG000183)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Traits and Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Abilities and Testing
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Psychological Testing and Assessment
Keywords
personality traits, verbal fluency, Big Five personality traits, conscientiousness, openness to experience, extraversion, emotional stability, emotional vulnerability, anxiety, depression, happiness, self-control, deliberation, age differences, cognitive performance, lifespan
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Aging, Conscience, Educational Status, Emotions, Extraversion, Psychological, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Neurotic Disorders, Personality, Personality Inventory, Prospective Studies, Semantics, Temperament, Verbal Behavior, Linear Models, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review