Cited by 37Perfectionism, Procrastination, Anxiety StudiesGrit, Self-Efficacy, and MotivationAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes

Measuring implemental delay in procrastination: separating onset and sustained goal striving.

Open access
Svartdal, Frode, Klingsieck, Katrin B., Steel, Piers, Gamst-Klaussen, Thor·2020·Personality and Individual Differences

Abstract

Scales measuring procrastination focus on different aspects of unnecessary and unwanted delay, delay in task implementation – an increased gap between intention and action – being a core characteristic. However, an inspection of existing procrastination scales reveals that the scales do not distinguish between two facets of implemental delay, onset delay, and delay related to sustained goal striving. We trace this failure to an imprecise understanding of “delay,” another core concept in procrastination. This paper discusses the relationship between onset and sustained delay in procrastination, and then describes a new scale attempting to measure these two facets of task implementation. In two studies (aggregated N = 465) we demonstrate, using exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis, that although onset and sustained action procrastination measures correlate, they are still separate facets of implemental procrastination. Problems with onset delay seem to be particularly important, increasingly so in high procrastinators. Implications, as well as suggestions for further research, are discussed.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.paid.2019.109762

Cites

54 of 54 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Delays in academic procrastination may result from late onset and impulsive diversions during work.

    “The delays seen in academic procrastination may result from late onset (e.g., “I did not start writing until just one week before deadline”) and impulsive diversions during work (e.g., “I was working, but got tired and had a coffee with a friend instead”) (Svartdal et al., 2020).”

    From How Study Environments Foster Academic Procrastination: Overview and Recommendations (2020) · cites this paper as Svartdal et al., 2020

  • Procrastination is a reliable predictor of study effort; high procrastinators spend less time in self-directed work.

    “as procrastination is a reliable predictor of study effort, high procrastinators spending less time in self-directed work (Lay, 1992; Svartdal et al., 2020)”

    From How Study Environments Foster Academic Procrastination: Overview and Recommendations (2020) · cites this paper as Svartdal et al., 2020

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Aitken, M. E. (1982). A personality profile of the college student procrastinator (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). USA: University of Pittsburgh.
  2. Mann, L., Burnett, P., Radford, M., & Ford, S. (1997). The Melbourne decision making questionnaire: an instrument for measuring patterns for coping with decisional conflict. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 10(1), 1-19 10.1002/(SICI)1099- 0771(199703)10:1 < 1::AID-BDM242 > 3.0.CO;2-X. · DOI
  3. Steel, P., & Weinhardt, J. (2018). The building blocks of motivation. In N. Anderson, D. S. Ones, H. K. Sinangil, & C. Viswesveran (Vol. Eds.), Handbook of industrial, work & organizational psychology: 3. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Svartdal, F., Klingsieck, K. B., Steel, P., & Gamst-Klaussen, T.
Affiliations
  • UiT The Arctic University of Norway (NO)
  • Paderborn University (DE)
  • University of Calgary (CA)
Corresponding author
Svartdal, Frode
Venue
Personality and Individual Differences
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2020-04
Volume
156
Pages
109762
ISSN
0191-8869 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2995570228
Cited by
37
References
53
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 2
FWCI
4.68
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Personality and Individual Differences (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • NORA - Norwegian Open Research Archives (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Perfectionism, Procrastination, Anxiety Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Grit, Self-Efficacy, and Motivation
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
Keywords
procrastination, delayed onset, goal pursuit, procrastination scale, intention-behavior gap, scale development

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review