CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 331Perfectionism, Procrastination, Anxiety StudiesGrit, Self-Efficacy, and MotivationPersonality Traits and Psychology

Procrastination and personality, performance, and mood

Steel, Piers, Brothen, Thomas, Wambach, Catherine·2001·Personality and Individual Differences
DOI 10.1016/s0191-8869(00)00013-1
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0191-8869(00)00013-1

Cites

65 of 65 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Research has not revealed a relation between intention and procrastination (r = -.03), meaning people who procrastinate recurrently do not lack an intention but experience difficulties acting on their intentions (intention-action gap).

    “Furthermore, research on motivational factors has not revealed a relation between intention and procrastination (r = -.03),meaning that people who procrastinate recurrently do not lack an intention to initiate or complete their tasks or assignments but, rather, experience difficulties acting on their intentions (i.e., the intention-action gap) (Steel, Brothen, & Wambach, 2001).”

    From Understanding and Treating Procrastination: A Review of a Common Self-Regulatory Failure (2014) · cites this paper as Steel, Brothen, & Wambach, 2001

  • In student populations, procrastination has been associated with increased stress, anxiety, depression, and poor academic performance.

    “Procrastination has been most thoroughly studied in student populations, where it has been associated with increased levels of stress, anxiety, depression and poor academic performance [2; 6], but also with putting off everyday obligations [7].”

    From Procrastination, Distress and Life Satisfaction across the Age Range – A German Representative Community Study (2016) · cites this paper as [6]

  • The findings of the study can be considered valid for self-assessed procrastination, but not necessarily for observable procrastinating behavior.

    “Data were limited to self-report. Therefore the findings of the study can be considered valid for self-assessed procrastination, however, not necessarily to observable procrastinating behavior [6].”

    From Procrastination, Distress and Life Satisfaction across the Age Range – A German Representative Community Study (2016) · cites this paper as [6]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

4 of the 69 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Related

Authors
Steel, P., Brothen, T., & Wambach, C.
Affiliations
University of Minnesota (US)
Corresponding author
Steel, Piers
ORCID
Venue
Personality and Individual Differences
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2001-01
Volume
30
Issue
1
Pages
95-106
ISSN
0191-8869 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1016/s0191-8869(00)00013-1
OpenAlex
W2068884509
Cited by
331
References
69
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 27 · 2023: 26 · 2022: 25 · 2021: 31 · 2020: 27 · 2019: 19 · 2018: 21 · 2017: 22 · 2016: 22 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 14 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 7
FWCI
4.43
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)
Locations
Personality and Individual Differences (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Perfectionism, Procrastination, Anxiety Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Grit, Self-Efficacy, and Motivation
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Traits and Psychology
Keywords
procrastination, self-report measures, observed behavior, intention-behavior gap, academic performance, mood, personality traits, neuroticism, self-esteem, locus of control, extraversion, psychoticism, dominance, self-monitoring, Personalized System of Instruction, self-concept, self-assessment

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review