The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Predictors of distress and coping during pandemic-related self isolation: The relative importance of personality traits and beliefs about personal threat
Open accessAbstract
During pandemics such as COVID-19, voluntary self-isolation is important for limiting the spread of infection. Little is known about the traits that predict distress or coping with pandemic-related self-isolation. Some studies suggest that personality variables (e.g., introversion, conscientiousness, resilience, optimism) are important in predicting distress and coping during self-isolation, but such studies have not controlled for important variables such as stressors associated with self-isolation, demographic variables, and individual differences in beliefs (worries) about the dangerousness of COVID-19. The present study is, to our knowledge, the first to investigate the role of personality traits, demographic characteristics, and COVID-related beliefs about contracting the coronavirus. Data from a population representative sample of 938 adults from the United States and Canada, in voluntary self-isolation, revealed that COVID-related threat beliefs were more important than various personality variables in predicting (a) self-isolation distress, (b) general distress, (c) stockpiling behaviors, and (c) use of personal protective equipment such as masks, gloves, and visors. There was little evidence that personality traits influenced threat beliefs. The findings are relevant for understanding distress and protective behaviors during the current pandemic, in subsequent waves of this pandemic, and in later pandemics, and for informing the development of targeted mental health interventions.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“In addition, individual differences exist in the level of COVID-19 related concerns and therefore in the vulnerability to the psychosocial effects of the pandemic (Mertens, Gerritsen, et al., 2020; Taylor et al., 2021; Vos et al., 2021).”
From The association between facets of mindfulness and COVID-19 related distress: A cross-sectional study (2023) · cites this paper as Taylor et al., 2021
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Thanks coefficient alpha, we’ll take it from here.
McNeish, D. (2018) · Psychological Methods · doi:10.1037/met0000144 · Cited by 2,533
Development and initial validation of the COVID Stress Scales
Taylor, S., Landry, C. A., Paluszek, M. M., Fergus, T. A., McKay, D., & Asmundson, G. J. G. (2020) · Journal of Anxiety Disorders · doi:10.1016/j.janxdis.2020.102232 · Cited by 1,169
COVID stress syndrome: Concept, structure, and correlates
Taylor, S., Landry, C. A., Paluszek, M. M., Fergus, T. A., McKay, D., & Asmundson, G. J. G. (2020) · Depression and Anxiety · doi:10.1002/da.23071 · Cited by 673
Self-citationCoelho, G. L. H., Vilar, R., Hanel, P. H. P., Monteiro, R. P., Ribeiro, M. G. C., & Gouveia, V. V. (2018) · Personality and Individual Differences · doi:10.1016/j.paid.2018.06.030 · Cited by 38
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 13
- Abdelrahman, 2020, Personality traits, risk perception, and protective behaviors of Arab residents of Qatar during the covid-19 pandemic, International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction, 1
- Bartone, 2018, Individual differences in adaptability to isolated, confined, and extreme environments, Aerospace Medicine and Human Performance, 89, 536, 10.3357/AMHP.4951.2018 · DOI
- Carvalho, 2020, Personality differences and COVID-19: Are extroversion [sic] and conscientiousness personality traits associated with engagement with containment measures?, Trends in Psychiatry and Psychotherapy. Advance online publication., 10.1590/2237-6089-2020-0029 · DOI
- Connor, 2003, Development of a new resilience scale: The Connor-Davidson resilience scale (CD-RISC), Depression and Anxiety, 18, 76, 10.1002/da.10113 · DOI · Paper page
- Digman, 1990, Personality structure: Emergence of the five-factor model, Annual Review of Psychology, 41, 417, 10.1146/annurev.ps.41.020190.002221 · DOI
- Ehrhart, 2009, Testing the latent factor structure and construct validity of the ten-item personality inventory, Personality and Individual Differences, 47, 900, 10.1016/j.paid.2009.07.012 · DOI
- Garbe, 2020, Influence of perceived threat of Covid-19 and HEXACO personality traits on toilet paper stockpiling, PLoS One, 15, 10.1371/journal.pone.0234232 · DOI
- Gosling, 2003, A very brief measure of the big-five personality domains, Journal of Research in Personality, 37, 504, 10.1016/S0092-6566(03)00046-1 · DOI · Paper page
- Kroenke, 2009, An ultra-brief screening scale for anxiety and depression: The PHQ-4, Psychosomatics, 50, 613
- Nunes, 2018, Short scales for the assessment of personality traits: Development and validation of the Portuguese ten-item personality inventory (TIPI), Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 461, 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00461 · DOI
- Somma, 2020, Dysfunctional personality features, non-scientifically supported causal beliefs, and emotional problems during the first month of the COVID-19 pandemic in Italy, Personality and Individual Differences, 165, 110139, 10.1016/j.paid.2020.110139 · DOI
- Taylor, 2021, COVID stress syndrome: Clinical and nosological considerations, Current Psychiatry Reports, 10.1007/s11920-021-01226-y · DOI
- Zajenkowski, 2020, Who complies with the restrictions to reduce the spread of COVID-19?, Personality and Individual Differences, 166, 110199, 10.1016/j.paid.2020.110199 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Taylor, S. (2022) · Annual Review of Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-072720-020131 · Cited by 164
Self-citationThe association between facets of mindfulness and COVID-19 related distress: A cross-sectional study
Boekhorst, M. G. B. M., & Duijndam, S. (2023) · Acta Psychologica · doi:10.1016/j.actpsy.2023.103826 · Cited by 2
Metadata
- Authors
- Taylor, S., Paluszek, M. M., Landry, C. A., Rachor, G. S., & Asmundson, G. J. G.
- Affiliations
- University of British Columbia (CA)
- University of Regina (CA)
- Corresponding author
- Taylor, Steven
- Venue
- Personality and Individual Differences
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2021-07
- Volume
- 176
- Pages
- 110779
- ISSN
- 0191-8869 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC9757028
- OpenAlex
- W3130030713
- Cited by
- 13
- References
- 4
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 3
- FWCI
- 2.05
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Licence
- Locations
- Personality and Individual Differences (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Canadian Institutes of Health Research
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › COVID-19 and Mental Health
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Traits and Psychology
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
- Keywords
- COVID-19 pandemic, psychological distress, coping, personality traits, threat beliefs, personal protective equipment use, demographic predictors, mental health interventions
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review