Cited by 15Healthcare professionals’ stress and burnoutPerfectionism, Procrastination, Anxiety StudiesStress and Burnout Research

The mediating role of self-compassion and repetitive negative thinking in the relationship between perfectionism and burnout in health-field students: A prospective study

Open access
Cabaços, Carolina, Macedo, António, Carneiro, Mário, Brito, Maria João, Amaral, Ana Paula, Araújo, Ana, Correia, Diogo Telles, Novais, Filipa +2 more·2023·Personality and Individual Differences

Abstract

Burnout negatively affects around 40 % of medical and dentistry students, a group with high levels of perfectionism, repetitive negative thinking (RNT) and low self-compassion. So far, literature has highlighted the beneficial effects of mindfulness and self-compassion-based interventions on reducing psychological distress; nevertheless, the relationship between perfectionism, self-compassion, RNT and burnout has not yet been studied in this population with a prospective study design. The aim of this prospective study was to analyse the role of perfectionism, self-compassion and RNT on burnout levels in medical and dentistry students after approximately one year and a half. 202 medical and dentistry students answered in T0 and T1 (after 18 months) to a self-report questionnaire that included measures to assess perfectionism, RNT, self-compassion, and burnout. Perfectionism, RNT and self-compassion correlated significantly with each other, and all correlated with Burnout. In mediation analyses, total perfectionism at T0 predicted burnout at T1, both directly and indirectly, through the mediating effect of self-compassion and RNT at T0. This study reinforces recent findings that self-compassion is a mediator of the relationship between perfectionism and burnout and adds that RNT also plays an important role in this predictive pathway.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.paid.2023.112314

Cites

0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Cabaços, C., Macedo, A., Carneiro, M., Brito, M. J., Amaral, A. P., Araújo, A., Correia, D. T., Novais, F., Vitória, P., & Pereira, A. T.
Affiliations
  • University of Coimbra (PT)
  • Universidade Politécnica de Coimbra (PT)
  • University of Lisbon (PT)
  • Iscte – Instituto Universitário de Lisboa (PT)
Corresponding author
Cabaços, Carolina
Venue
Personality and Individual Differences
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2023-10
Volume
213
Pages
112314
ISSN
0191-8869 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4381385588
Cited by
15
References
37
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 1
FWCI
5.34
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
Personality and Individual Differences (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Healthcare professionals’ stress and burnout
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Perfectionism, Procrastination, Anxiety Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Stress and Burnout Research
Keywords
perfectionism, burnout, self-compassion, repetitive negative thinking, medical students, dental students, mediating effect, health professions students, psychological distress

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review