The DOI matches its Crossref record; 30 of the 30 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Disengagement from pain: the role of catastrophic thinking about pain
Abstract
This paper reports an experimental investigation of attentional engagement to and disengagement from pain. Thirty-seven pain-free volunteers performed a cueing task in which they were instructed to respond to visual target stimuli, i.e. the words 'pain' and 'tone'. Targets were preceded by pain stimuli or tone stimuli as cues. Participants were characterized as high or low pain catastrophizers, using self-reports. We found that the effect of cueing upon target detection was differential for high and low pain catastrophizers. Analyses revealed a similar amount of attentional engagement to pain in both groups. However, we also found that participants high in pain catastrophizing had difficulty disengaging from pain, whereas participants low in pain catastrophizing showed no retarded disengagement from pain. Our results provide further evidence that catastrophic thinking enhances the attentional demand of pain, particularly resulting in difficulty disengaging from pain. The clinical implications of these findings are discussed.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Because the presence of pain does not always interfere with ongoing action, research has focused on the characteristics of pain situations that lead to the initial intrusion into the space of attention (or attentional interference), including variables such as intensity, novelty, expectation, fear, or catastrophizing.”
From A Contextual Analysis of Attention to Chronic Pain: What the Patient Does With Their Pain Might Be More Important Than Their Awareness or Vigilance Alone (2007) · cites this paper as [33]
Citations
Cites
The Pain Catastrophizing Scale: Development and validation.
Sullivan, M. J. L., Bishop, S. R., & Pivik, J. (1995) · Psychological Assessment · doi:10.1037//1040-3590.7.4.524 · Cited by 8,227
Theoretical perspectives on the relation between catastrophizing and pain
Sullivan, M. J. L., Thorn, B., Haythornthwaite, J. A., Keefe, F., Martin, M., Bradley, L. A., & Lefebvre, J. C. (2001) · The Clinical Journal of Pain · doi:10.1097/00002508-200103000-00008 · Cited by 2,472
Pain demands attention: A cognitive–affective model of the interruptive function of pain.
Eccleston, C., & Crombez, G. (1999) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.125.3.356 · Cited by 1,718
Self-citationA cognitive-motivational analysis of anxiety.
Mogg, K., & Bradley, B. P. (1998) · Behaviour Research and Therapy · doi:10.1016/s0005-7967(98)00063-1 · Cited by 1,642
Technology in mental health care delivery systems
Sidowski, J. B., Johnson, J. H., & Williams, T. A. (1980) · Ablex Pub. Corp. eBooks · Cited by 977
Van Damme, S., Crombez, G., Bijttebier, P., Goubert, L., & Van Houdenhove, B. (2002) · Pain · doi:10.1016/s0304-3959(01)00463-8 · Cited by 579
Self-citationCognitive-processing bias in chronic pain: a review and integration.
Pincus, T., & Morley, S. (2001) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.127.5.599 · Cited by 501
Vlaeyen, J. W. S., de Jong, J., Geilen, M., Heuts, P. H. T. G., & van Breukelen, G. (2002) · The Clinical Journal of Pain · doi:10.1097/00002508-200207000-00006 · Cited by 499
“Attention” to pain in persons with chronic pain: A behavioral approach
McCracken, L. M. (1997) · Behavior Therapy · doi:10.1016/s0005-7894(97)80047-0 · Cited by 483
Selectivity of learning caused by affective states.
Bower, G. H., Gilligan, S. G., & Monteiro, K. P. (1981) · Journal of Experimental Psychology General · doi:10.1037/0096-3445.110.4.451 · Cited by 390
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The fear-avoidance model of musculoskeletal pain: Current state of scientific evidence
Leeuw, M., Goossens, M. E. J. B., Linton, S. J., Crombez, G., Boersma, K., & Vlaeyen, J. W. S. (2007) · Journal of Behavioral Medicine · doi:10.1007/s10865-006-9085-0 · Cited by 2,261
Self-citationPain catastrophizing: a critical review.
Quartana, P. J., Campbell, C. M., & Edwards, R. R. (2009) · Expert Review of Neurotherapeutics · doi:10.1586/ern.09.34 · Cited by 1,405
Haefeli, M., & Elfering, A. (2005) · European Spine Journal · doi:10.1007/s00586-005-1044-x · Cited by 1,308
The role of psychosocial processes in the development and maintenance of chronic pain
Edwards, R. R., Dworkin, R. H., Sullivan, M. D., Turk, D. C., & Wasan, A. D. (2016) · The Journal of Pain · doi:10.1016/j.jpain.2016.01.001 · Cited by 954
Catastrophizing and pain in arthritis, fibromyalgia, and other rheumatic diseases
Edwards, R. R., Bingham, C. O., Bathon, J. M., & Haythornthwaite, J. A. (2006) · Arthritis Care & Research · doi:10.1002/art.21865 · Cited by 511
Metadata
- Authors
- Van Damme, S., Crombez, G., & Eccleston, C.
- Affiliations
- Utrecht University (NL)
- University of Bath (GB)
- Venue
- Pain
- Published
- 2004-01
- Volume
- 107
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 70-76
- ISSN
- 0304-3959 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2129150173
- Cited by
- 252
- References
- 30
- Citations by year
- 2026: 6 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 14 · 2014: 17 · 2013: 20 · 2012: 15
- FWCI
- 6.59
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Pain (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Ghent University Academic Bibliography (Ghent University) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation › Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Pain Management and Placebo Effect
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Pediatric Pain Management Techniques
- Keywords
- pain catastrophizing, catastrophic thinking, attentional disengagement, attentional engagement, target detection, pain perception
- MeSH terms
- Acoustic Stimulation, Adolescent, Adult, Analysis of Variance, Anxiety, Attention, Cues, Transcutaneous Electric Nerve Stimulation, Female, Humans, Male, Pain, Pain Measurement, Random Allocation, Reaction Time, Thinking
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
