The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
ERK is sequentially activated in neurons, microglia, and astrocytes by spinal nerve ligation and contributes to mechanical allodynia in this neuropathic pain model
Abstract
Activation of extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK), a mitogen activated-protein kinase (MAPK), in dorsal horn neurons contributes to inflammatory pain by transcription-dependent and -independent means. We have now investigated if ERK is activated in the spinal cord after a spinal nerve ligation (SNL) and if this contributes to the neuropathic pain-like behavior generated in this model. An L5 SNL induces an immediate (<10 min) but transient (<6 h) induction of phosphoERK (pERK) restricted to neurons in the superficial dorsal horn. This is followed by a widespread induction of pERK in spinal microglia that peaks between 1 and 3 days post-surgery. On Day 10, pERK is expressed both in astrocytes and microglia, but by Day 21 predominantly in astrocytes in the dorsal horn. In the L5 DRG SNL transiently induces pERK in neurons at 10 min, and in satellite cells on Day 10 and 21. Intrathecal injection of the MEK (ERK kinase) inhibitor PD98059 on Day 2, 10 or 21 reduces SNL-induced mechanical allodynia. Our results suggest that ERK activation in the dorsal horn, as well as in the DRG, mediates pain through different mechanisms operating in different cells at different times. The sequential activation of ERK in dorsal horn microglia and then in astrocytes might reflect distinct roles for these two subtypes of glia in the temporal evolution of neuropathic pain.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Neuronal plasticity: Increasing the gain in pain
Woolf, C. J., & Salter, M. W. (2000) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.288.5472.1765 · Cited by 3,781
Ho Kim, S., & Mo Chung, J. (1992) · Pain · doi:10.1016/0304-3959(92)90041-9 · Cited by 3,069
Schäfers, M., Svensson, C. I., Sommer, C., & Sorkin, L. S. (2003) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.23-07-02517.2003 · Cited by 519
Lim, G., Sung, B., Ji, R.-R., & Mao, J. (2003) · Pain · doi:10.1016/s0304-3959(03)00242-2 · Cited by 195
Self-citation
Cited by
Central sensitization: a generator of pain hypersensitivity by central neural plasticity
Latremoliere, A., & Woolf, C. J. (2009) · The Journal of Pain · doi:10.1016/j.jpain.2009.06.012 · Cited by 3,913
Self-citationThe neuropathic pain triad: neurons, immune cells and glia
Scholz, J., & Woolf, C. J. (2007) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nn1992 · Cited by 1,732
Self-citationModels and Mechanisms of Hyperalgesia and Allodynia
Sandkühler, J. (2009) · Physiological Reviews · doi:10.1152/physrev.00025.2008 · Cited by 1,148
Role of the Immune system in chronic pain
Marchand, F., Perretti, M., & McMahon, S. B. (2005) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn1700 · Cited by 1,098
Ji, R.-R., Gereau, R. W., Malcangio, M., & Strichartz, G. R. (2009) · Brain Research Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.brainresrev.2008.12.011 · Cited by 989
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Zhuang, Z.-Y., Gerner, P., Woolf, C. J., & Ji, R.-R.
- Venue
- Pain
- Published
- 2005-03
- Volume
- 114
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 149-159
- ISSN
- 0304-3959 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2006161356
- Cited by
- 774
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 18.98
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: ERK is sequentially activated in neurons, microglia, and astrocytes by spinal nerve ligation and contributes to mechanical allodynia in this neuropathic pain model. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.pain.2004.12.022
- The paper
- Zhuang, Z.-Y., Gerner, P., Woolf, C. J., & Ji, R.-R. (2005). ERK is sequentially activated in neurons, microglia, and astrocytes by spinal nerve ligation and contributes to mechanical allodynia in this neuropathic pain model. Pain. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pain.2004.12.022
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.