The DOI matches its Crossref record; 46 of the 46 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Explaining sex differences in chronic musculoskeletal pain in a general population
Open accessAbstract
Many studies report a female predominance in the prevalence of chronic musculoskeletal pain (CMP) but the mechanisms explaining these sex differences are poorly understood. Data from a random postal questionnaire survey in the Dutch general population were used to examine whether sex differences in the prevalences of CMP are due to sex differences in the distribution of known potential risk factors for CMP (exposure model) and/or to the different importance of risk factors for CMP (i.e. show different strength of association) in men and women (vulnerability model). In the present analyses, 909 men and 1178 women aged 25-65 were included. CMP was defined as pain lasting longer than 3 months and was assessed for 10 anatomical locations (neck, shoulder, higher back, elbow, wrist/hand, lower back, hip, knee, ankle, foot). Sex differences in CMP could not be explained by a different distribution of age, educational level, smoking status, overweight, physical activity, and pain catastrophizing. Having no paid job was associated with CMP, explaining part of the sex differences, but its role seems complex. Risk factors with a sex-specific association were: overweight (all pain locations) and older age (lower extremities)--both having only an effect among women--and pain catastrophizing (upper extremities), which was stronger associated with CMP among men than among women. In conclusion, sex differences in prevalence of CMP may partly be explained by sex differences in vulnerability to risk factors for CMP. Future research towards sex-specific identification of risk factors for CMP is warranted. Eventually this may lead to sex-specific prevention and management of CMP.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“many of the psychosocial factors and, more specifically, pain- specific cognitive and affective processes, have strong associations with functional brain responses to pain.”
From Evaluating psychosocial contributions to chronic pain outcomes (2018) · cites this paper as [387]
In the citing paper
“studies of the brain’s default mode network and other resting state networks suggest long-lasting functional brain changes related to the presence of chronic pain 379, 384–387.”
From Evaluating psychosocial contributions to chronic pain outcomes (2018) · cites this paper as [387]
In the citing paper
“Further, studies show changes in functional connectivity in chronic pain patients.”
From Evaluating psychosocial contributions to chronic pain outcomes (2018) · cites this paper as [387]
In the citing paper
“A growing number of neuroimaging studies have suggested that variability in catastrophizing is associated with individual differences in the functional brain response to a variety of stimuli, as well as potential alterations in brain morphology 359, 384, 387, 389–395.”
From Evaluating psychosocial contributions to chronic pain outcomes (2018) · cites this paper as [387]
In the citing paper
“In addition, response to treatment differs between sexes [6–10].”
From Chronic pain and sex-differences; women accept and move, while men feel blue (2017) · cites this paper as [10]
Citations
Cites
The Pain Catastrophizing Scale: Development and validation.
Sullivan, M. J. L., Bishop, S. R., & Pivik, J. (1995) · Psychological Assessment · doi:10.1037//1040-3590.7.4.524 · Cited by 8,227
Fear-avoidance and its consequences in chronic musculoskeletal pain: a state of the art.
Vlaeyen, J. W. S., & Linton, S. J. (2000) · Pain · doi:10.1016/s0304-3959(99)00242-0 · Cited by 4,931
Barros, A. J. D., & Hirakata, V. N. (2003) · BMC Medical Research Methodology · doi:10.1186/1471-2288-3-21 · Cited by 4,163
Interaction revisited: the difference between two estimates.
Altman, D. G., & Bland, J. M. (2003) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.326.7382.219 · Cited by 3,203
Osteoarthritis: New Insights. Part 1: The Disease and Its Risk Factors
Felson, D. T., Lawrence, R. C., Dieppe, P. A., Hirsch, R., Helmick, C. G., Jordan, J. M., Kington, R. S., Lane, N. E., Nevitt, M. C., Zhang, Y., et al. (2000) · Annals of Internal Medicine · doi:10.7326/0003-4819-133-8-200010170-00016 · Cited by 2,565
Bias and causal associations in observational research
Grimes, D. A., & Schulz, K. F. (2002) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(02)07451-2 · Cited by 1,553
Wendel‐Vos, W. (2003) · Journal of Clinical Epidemiology · doi:10.1016/s0895-4356(03)00220-8 · Cited by 1,417
Musculoskeletal pain in the Netherlands: prevalences, consequences and risk groups, the DMC3-study
Picavet, H. S. J., & Schouten, J. S. A. G. (2003) · Pain · doi:10.1016/s0304-3959(02)00372-x · Cited by 1,197
Urwin, M., Symmons, D. P. M., Allison, T., Brammah, T., Busby, H., Roxby, M., Simmons, A., & Williams, G. H. (1998) · Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases · doi:10.1136/ard.57.11.649 · Cited by 1,161
Felson, D. T., & McAlindon, T. E. (2002) · Annals of Internal Medicine · doi:10.7326/0003-4819-136-1-200201010-00019 · Cited by 1,125
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 201–206 of 206
Nohor, N., Hassan, M. M., Sultana, S., Tama, T. T., Akash, Y., Moni, M., Mim, M. A., Mostafa, M. N., Akter, M. A., Mueid, M. A. S., et al. (2026) · Health Science Reports · doi:10.1002/hsr2.72100
Martin, M., Soligon, C. A., Galarneau, J., Bullock, G. S., Mohtadi, N. G., Schneider, G., & Emery, C. A. (2026) · Clinical Journal of Sports Medicine · doi:10.1097/jsm.0000000000001438
Work-related musculoskeletal disorders
Major, M.-È. (2026) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-443-45863-7.00054-8
Nanteza, M., Johansson, F., Lindfors, P., Côté, P., & Skillgate, E. (2026) · BMJ Public Health · doi:10.1136/bmjph-2025-003159
Gender Differences in Sports Injuries of the Foot and Ankle
Geaney, L. E., Jamieson, M. D., & Jackson, C. (2026) · Foot and Ankle Clinics · doi:10.1016/j.fcl.2026.06.009
Begum, R., Chamaa, A. E., Parikh, P., Walton, D. M., & Rushton, A. B. (2026) · BMJ Open · doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2026-120001
Metadata
- Authors
- Wijnhoven, H. A. H., de Vet, H. C. W., & Picavet, S. J. H.
- Affiliations
- National Institute for Public Health and the Environment (NL)
- Venue
- Pain
- Published
- 2006-09
- Volume
- 124
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 158-166
- ISSN
- 0304-3959 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1995764137
- Cited by
- 206
- References
- 46
- Citations by year
- 2026: 7 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 15 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 5
- FWCI
- 6.26
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- hdl.handle.net
- Licence
- other-oa
- Locations
- Pain (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Amsterdam UMC (VU Amsterdam) - Institutional Repository (publishedVersion)
- Pure Amsterdam UMC (submittedVersion)
- VU Research Portal (submittedVersion)
- Rivm Repository (Netherlands National Institute for Public Health and the Environment) (submittedVersion)
- Rivm (National Institute for Public Health and the Environment) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation › Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Sex and Gender in Healthcare
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Fibromyalgia and Chronic Fatigue Syndrome Research
- Keywords
- chronic musculoskeletal pain, sex differences, prevalence, risk factors, exposure models, vulnerability model, pain catastrophizing, overweight, unemployment, age, sex-specific association, general population
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Age Factors, Aged, Chronic Disease, Cross-Sectional Studies, Educational Status, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Musculoskeletal Diseases, Pain, Pain Measurement, Risk Factors, Sex Characteristics, Cohort Studies
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review