Cited by 236Pediatric Pain Management TechniquesMusculoskeletal pain and rehabilitationChildhood Cancer Survivors' Quality of Life

Disability in adolescents with chronic pain: Patterns and predictors across different domains of functioning

Gauntlett-Gilbert, Jeremy, Eccleston, Christopher·2007·Pain

Abstract

Many children and adolescents experience recurrent pain, but only a few become disabled by it. Research has established that higher pain intensity and worse depression seem to predict poorer functioning in this population. Parent and family variables have been minimally researched. This study investigated functional disability, social/adaptive functioning and school attendance in a population of highly disabled adolescents and their parents seeking help for chronic pain. Adolescents (N=110) were assessed using the Bath Adolescent Pain Questionnaire [BAPQ; Eccleston C, Jordan A, McCracken LM, Sleed M, Connell H, Clinch J. The Bath Adolescent Pain Questionnaire (BAPQ): Development and preliminary psychometric evaluation of an instrument to assess the impact of chronic pain on adolescents. Pain 2005;118:263-70], a multidimensional instrument designed for a pain population. Pain intensity and depression predicted functional disability. However, social/adaptive functioning was associated with different variables, including parent factors, and school attendance showed no association with pain intensity or anxiety. The results emphasise the need to measure multiple domains of functioning, and show that the connections between pain, physical disability and adaptive functioning are looser than might be predicted.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.pain.2006.12.021

Cites

11 of 11 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Gauntlett-Gilbert, J., & Eccleston, C.
Affiliations
Royal National Hospital for Rheumatic Diseases (GB)
Venue
Pain
Published
2007-09
Volume
131
Issue
1
Pages
132-141
ISSN
0304-3959 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2080113925
Cited by
236
References
11
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 19 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 16 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 14 · 2013: 15 · 2012: 15
FWCI
13.96
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Pain (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Pediatric Pain Management Techniques
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Childhood Cancer Survivors' Quality of Life
Keywords
chronic pain, adolescents, functional disability, school attendance, pain intensity, depression, anxiety, parental factors, predictors of functioning
MeSH terms
Activities of Daily Living, Adolescent, Psychology, Adolescent, Chronic Disease, Depression, Disability Evaluation, Female, United Kingdom, Humans, Male, Pain, Surveys and Questionnaires, Risk Factors, Social Adjustment, Incidence, Sickness Impact Profile, Risk Assessment

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review