Cited by 54Pediatric Pain Management TechniquesMusculoskeletal pain and rehabilitationYouth Substance Use and School Attendance

Development of a group intervention to improve school functioning in adolescents with chronic pain and depressive symptoms: A study of feasibility and preliminary efficacy

Logan, D. E., Simons, L. E.·2010·Journal of Pediatric Psychology

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To establish feasibility and preliminary efficacy of "Coping with Pain in School" (CPS), an intervention to improve school functioning in adolescents with chronic pain and depressive symptoms. METHODS: Forty adolescents and parents participated in this uncontrolled trial. Participants completed measures of pain severity, depression, and school attendance at baseline and one month after participating in a manualized group intervention. Several other indicators of school functioning were explored. RESULTS: CPS was generally acceptable and satisfying to families and feasible to implement but participation was low. Post-treatment analyses suggest that pain, some dimensions of depression, and school attendance improved after treatment. Conclusions CPS is feasible and holds promise in terms of its effects on pain and school attendance. Addressing enrollment challenges, refining the role of depression and its treatment, and further developing treatments with a school-functioning focus for adolescents with chronic pain are key areas for continued research.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/jpepsy/jsq008

Cites

51 of 51 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 52 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Logan, D. E., & Simons, L. E.
Affiliations
Boston Children's Hospital (US)
Venue
Journal of Pediatric Psychology
Published
2010-02-18
Volume
35
Issue
8
Pages
823-836
ISSN
  • 0146-8693 (ISSN-L)
  • 1465-735X
OpenAlex
W2118355888
Cited by
54
References
52
Citations by year
2025: 5 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 4
FWCI
2.61
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Pediatric Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Klingenstein Third Generation Foundation
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Pediatric Pain Management Techniques
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
  • Social Sciences › Education › Youth Substance Use and School Attendance
Keywords
chronic pain, adolescents, depressive symptoms, school functioning, group intervention, school attendance, pain coping, feasibility, intervention efficacy, parental involvement
MeSH terms
Adaptation, Psychological, Adolescent, Behavior Therapy, Child, Chronic Disease, Cross-Sectional Studies, Depression, Feasibility Studies, Female, Humans, Male, Pain, Pain Measurement, Parents, Pilot Projects, Schools, Self Concept, Treatment Outcome, Patient Selection, Pain Management

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review