Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 465

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The methodology of experimentally induced diffuse noxious inhibitory control (DNIC)-like effect in humans

Pud, Dorit, Granovsky, Yelena, Yarnitsky, David·2009·Pain

Abstract

aFaculty of Social Welfare and Health Sciences, University of Haifa, Israel bThe Laboratory of Clinical Neurophysiology, the Rappaport Faculty of Medicine, Technion – Israel Institute of Technology, Israel cDepartment of Neurology, Rambam Medical Center, Haifa, Israel *Corresponding author. Address: Faculty of Social Welfare and Health Sciences, University of Haifa, Haifa 31905, Israel. Tel.: +972 4 8288006; fax: +972 4 8288017. E-mail address:[email protected]

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.pain.2009.02.015

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Cited by

See all 465

Metadata

Authors
Pud, D., Granovsky, Y., & Yarnitsky, D.
Venue
Pain
Published
2009-07
Volume
144
Issue
1
Pages
16-19
ISSN
0304-3959 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2091693287
Cited by
465
References
5
FWCI
14.96
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.