Cited by 146Pain Mechanisms and TreatmentsPain Management and Placebo EffectPain Management and Treatment

Sex differences in temporal characteristics of descending inhibitory control: an evaluation using repeated bilateral experimental induction of muscle pain

Ge, Hong-You, Madeleine, Pascal, Arendt-Nielsen, Lars·2004·Pain

Abstract

Little is known about sex differences in the temporal pattern of descending inhibitory mechanisms, such as descending noxious inhibitory control (DNIC). Sex differences in temporal characteristics of DNIC were investigated by measuring pressure pain thresholds (PPTs) over time in the trapezius muscles (local pain areas) and the posterolateral neck muscles (referred pain areas) following repeated bilateral injection of hypertonic versus isotonic saline into both trapezius muscles. Ten females and 11 males received two consecutive bilateral injections, with 15 min interval, of either 5.8% hypertonic saline (0.5 ml in each side for each bilateral injection) or isotonic saline as a control in a randomized manner. Following hypertonic saline injection, the maximal pain intensities of the first and second bilateral injections were significantly higher in females than in males. The PPTs in the trapezius muscles were significantly lower in females than in males. Significantly higher PPTs (hypoalgesia) in men than in women were shown 15 min after the first bilateral injection, and 7.5 and 15 min after the second bilateral injection in the referred pain areas. Importantly, the second bilateral injection failed to further increase the PPTs for both sexes. These results showed that there were sex differences in temporal characteristics of descending inhibition with long-lasting hypoalgesia in men than in women. Repeated noxious muscular stimuli may inhibit further build-up of DNIC, which…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.pain.2004.03.005

Cites

46 of 46 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Among couples, high spousal depressive symptoms predict worsening patient disability and disease activity in rheumatoid arthritis over one year.

    “among couples, high levels of spousal depressive symptoms predict worsening patient disability and disease activity in patients with rheumatoid arthritis over a 1-year period 123.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ge, H.-Y., Madeleine, P., & Arendt-Nielsen, L.
Affiliations
Aalborg University (DK)
Venue
Pain
Published
2004-07
Volume
110
Issue
1
Pages
72-78
ISSN
0304-3959 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1982175970
Cited by
146
References
46
Citations by year
2025: 9 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 6
FWCI
4.32
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Pain (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • VBN Forskningsportal (Aalborg Universitet) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Pain Mechanisms and Treatments
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Pain Management and Placebo Effect
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine › Pain Management and Treatment
Keywords
sex differences, pressure pain threshold, trapezius, referred pain, hypertonic saline injection, hypoalgesia, descending pain inhibition, descending facilitation, descending pain modulation
MeSH terms
Adult, Female, Humans, Injections, Intramuscular, Male, Neural Inhibition, Pain, Pressure, Saline Solution, Hypertonic, Sex Characteristics, Case-Control Studies, Pain Threshold, Muscle, Skeletal

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review