The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Similar itch and nociceptive sensations evoked by punctate cutaneous application of capsaicin, histamine and cowhage
Open accessAbstract
Itch evoked by cowhage or histamine is reduced or blocked by capsaicin desensitization, suggesting that pruriceptive neurons are capsaicin-sensitive. Topical capsaicin can evoke both nociceptive sensations and itch, whereas intradermal injection of capsaicin evokes only burning pain. To dissociate the pruritic and nociceptive sensory effects caused by the chemical activation of sensory neurons, chemicals were applied in a punctiform manner to the skin of the forearm using individual, heat-inactivated cowhage spicules treated with various concentrations of capsaicin (1-200 mg/ml) or histamine (0.01-100 mg/ml). Perceived intensities of itch, pricking/stinging and burning were obtained every 30 s using the general version of the Labeled Magnitude Scale and compared with ratings evoked by individual native cowhage spicules. Similar to cowhage, capsaicin and histamine spicules reliably evoked sensations of itch in a dose-dependent manner which were most often accompanied by pricking/stinging and to a lesser extent burning. Spicules containing 200 mg/ml capsaicin or 10 mg/ml histamine yielded peak magnitudes and durations of sensations comparable to those elicited by cowhage. Each type of spicule also produced comparable areas of dysesthesias (enhanced mechanically evoked itch or pain) and/or skin reactions (wheal and/or flare) in surrounding skin, though inconsistently. The incidence of flare was greater in response to histamine than to capsaicin or cowhage. These results suggest the possibility that capsaicin, histamine and cowhage activate common peripheral or central neural mechanisms that mediate pruritic sensations and associated dysesthesias.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Physiology and Pathophysiology of Itch
Cevikbas, F., & Lerner, E. A. (2020) · Physiological Reviews · doi:10.1152/physrev.00017.2019 · Cited by 282
Akiyama, T., & Carstens, E. (2013) · Neuroscience · doi:10.1016/j.neuroscience.2013.07.035 · Cited by 272
The multiple pathways for itch and their interactions with pain
Davidson, S., & Giesler, G. J. (2010) · Trends in Neurosciences · doi:10.1016/j.tins.2010.09.002 · Cited by 261
Normal and abnormal coding of somatosensory stimuli causing pain
Prescott, S. A., Ma, Q., & De Koninck, Y. (2014) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nn.3629 · Cited by 210
Metadata
- Authors
- Sikand, P., Shimada, S. G., Green, B. G., & LaMotte, R. H.
- Venue
- Pain
- Published
- 2009-07
- Volume
- 144
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 66-75
- ISSN
- 0304-3959 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2086577243
- Cited by
- 160
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 5.93
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Similar itch and nociceptive sensations evoked by punctate cutaneous application of capsaicin, histamine and cowhage. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.pain.2009.03.001
- The paper
- Sikand, P., Shimada, S. G., Green, B. G., & LaMotte, R. H. (2009). Similar itch and nociceptive sensations evoked by punctate cutaneous application of capsaicin, histamine and cowhage. Pain. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pain.2009.03.001
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.