Cited by 232Pain Management and Placebo EffectMigraine and Headache StudiesStatistical Methods in Clinical Trials

A systematic review of adverse events in placebo groups of anti-migraine clinical trials

Amanzio, Martina, Corazzini, Luca Latini, Vase, Lene, Benedetti, Fabrizio·2009·Pain

Abstract

In analgesic clinical trials, adverse events are reported for the painkiller under evaluation and compared with adverse events in the placebo group. Interestingly, patients who receive the placebo often report a high frequency of adverse events, but little is understood about the nature of these negative effects. In the present study, we compared the rates of adverse events reported in the placebo arms of clinical trials for three classes of anti-migraine drugs: NSAIDs, triptans and anticonvulsants. We identified 73 clinical trials in 69 studies describing adverse events in placebo groups: 8 were clinical trials with NSAIDs, 56 were trials with triptans, and 9 were trials with anticonvulsants. Studies were selected of all Medline/PubMed or CENTRAL referenced trials published until 2007. Adverse event profiles of the three classes were compared using a systematic review approach. We found that the rate of adverse events in the placebo arms of trials with anti-migraine drugs was high. In addition, and most interestingly, the adverse events in the placebo arms corresponded to those of the anti-migraine medication against which the placebo was compared. For example, anorexia and memory difficulties, which are typical adverse events of anticonvulsants, were present only in the placebo arm of these trials. These results suggest that the adverse events in placebo arms of clinical trials of anti-migraine medications depend on the adverse events of the active medication against which the placebo is compared. These findings are in accordance with the expectation theory of placebo and nocebo effects.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.pain.2009.07.010

Cites

90 of 90 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Negative expectations may play a role in producing side effects and adverse events during trials and treatment.

    “Similarly, there is evidence suggesting that negative expectations can contribute to a variety of side effects and adverse events in clinical trials and medical care (Amanzio et al., 2009; Barsky et al., 2002; Colloca and Finniss, 2012; Petersen et al., 2014).”

    From Distinct neural representations of placebo and nocebo effects (2015) · cites this paper as Amanzio et al., 2009

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Amanzio, M., Corazzini, L. L., Vase, L., & Benedetti, F.
Affiliations
  • Aarhus University (DK)
  • University of Turin (IT)
Corresponding author
Amanzio, Martina
Venue
Pain
Published
2009-12
Volume
146
Issue
3
Pages
261-269
ISSN
0304-3959 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2064879719
Cited by
232
References
90
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 23 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 18 · 2015: 16 · 2014: 23 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 20
FWCI
0.99
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Pain (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Institutional Research Information System University of Turin (University of Turin) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Regione Piemonte
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Pain Management and Placebo Effect
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Migraine and Headache Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials
Keywords
antimigraine drugs, migraine, triptans, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, antiepileptic drugs, adverse event profiles, nocebo effect
MeSH terms
Analgesics, Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal, Anticonvulsants, Data Interpretation, Statistical, Ethnicity, Humans, Migraine Disorders, Tryptamines, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic, Serotonin Receptor Agonists

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review