Cited by 51Medication Adherence and ComplianceCancer survivorship and careBreast Cancer Treatment Studies

Participant-Reported Symptoms and Their Effect on Long-Term Adherence in the International Breast Cancer Intervention Study I (IBIS I)

Open access
Smith, Samuel George, Sestak, Ivana, Howell, Anthony, Forbes, John, Cuzick, Jack·2017·Journal of Clinical Oncology

Abstract

Purpose: To assess the role of participant-reported symptoms on long-term adherence to preventive therapy in the United Kingdom sample of the International Breast Cancer Intervention Study (IBIS-I). IBIS-I was a randomized controlled trial that investigated the effectiveness of tamoxifen in reducing the risk of breast cancer among women at increased risk of the disease. Participants and Methods: Women were randomly assigned to tamoxifen versus placebo (20 mg/day; n = 4,279). After 456 exclusions, 3,823 women were included in this analysis. Adherence (< 4.5 years or ≥ 4.5 years) was calculated using data from six monthly clinical visits. Analyses were adjusted for age, Tyrer-Cuzick risk, smoking, use of hormone replacement therapy, menopausal status, baseline menopausal symptoms, and treatment. Results: Overall, 69.7% of women were adherent for at least 4.5 years (tamoxifen: 65.2% v placebo: 74.0%; P < .001). Differences in adherence between treatment arms were observed from 12 months onward (all P < .01) and were largest at 54 months. Dropout rates were highest in the first 12 to 18 months and decreased thereafter. Women reporting nausea/vomiting were less likely to be adherent in both the tamoxifen (odds ratio [OR], 0.57; 95% CI, 0.37 to 0.86; P = .007) and placebo (OR, 0.58; 95% CI, 0.37 to 0.93; P = .023) arms. Headaches were associated with adherence only in the placebo arm (OR, 0.62; 95% CI, 0.42 to 0.91; P = .016), whereas gynecologic symptoms were significant only in the tamoxifen arm (OR, 0.77; 95% CI, 0.62 to 0.97; P = .024). Effect sizes for each symptom on adherence were not significantly different between the treatment groups ( P > .05). In both treatment arms, we observed significant trends for lower adherence with increasing severity for all symptoms ( P < .01) except headaches ( P = .054). Conclusion: In the IBIS-I trial, experiencing predefined symptoms in the first 6 months reduced long-term adherence. Effects were similar between treatment arms, suggesting that women were attributing age-related symptoms to preventive therapy. Interventions were required to support symptom management.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1200/jco.2016.71.7439

Cites

43 of 43 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Smith, S. G., Sestak, I., Howell, A., Forbes, J., & Cuzick, J.
Affiliations
  • University of Leeds (GB)
  • Samuel George Smith, Leeds Institute of Health Science, University of Leeds, Leeds; Samuel George Smith, Ivana Sestak, and Jack Cuzick, Wolfson Institute of Preventive Medicine, Queen Mary University of London, London; Anthony Howell, Institute of Cancer Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom; and John Forbes, Calvary Mater Newcastle Hospital, Newcastle, Australia.
Corresponding author
Smith, Samuel George
Venue
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Published
2017-08-10
Volume
35
Issue
23
Pages
2666-2673
ISSN
  • 0732-183X (ISSN-L)
  • 1527-7755
OpenAlex
W2619605504
Cited by
51
References
43
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 3
FWCI
5.14
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Journal of Clinical Oncology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • White Rose Research Online (University of Leeds, The University of Sheffield, University of York) (acceptedVersion)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Research Explorer (The University of Manchester) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Queen Mary Research Online (Queen Mary University of London) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • NOVA (University of Newcastle Australia) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
Cancer Research UK (C42785/A17965, C569-A16891, 16891, 16893)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Family Practice › Medication Adherence and Compliance
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer survivorship and care
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cancer Research › Breast Cancer Treatment Studies
Keywords
medication adherence, tamoxifen, breast cancer chemoprevention, nausea and vomiting, headache, gynecologic symptoms, dropout, adverse drug reactions, high-risk women, long-term adherence, symptom severity, hormone replacement therapy, menopausal symptoms, trial retention
MeSH terms
Breast Neoplasms, Female, Genital Diseases, Female, Headache, Humans, Middle Aged, Nausea, Patient Dropouts, Placebos, Risk Factors, Tamoxifen, Time Factors, Vomiting, Drug Monitoring, Antineoplastic Agents, Hormonal, Self Report, Symptom Assessment

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review