Cited by 331Pain Management and Placebo EffectGastrointestinal motility and disordersAcupuncture Treatment Research Studies

Increased placebo analgesia over time in irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) patients is associated with desire and expectation but not endogenous opioid mechanisms

Vase, Lene, Robinson, Michael E., Verne, Nicholas G., Price, Donald D.·2005·Pain

Abstract

A study was conducted to determine whether changes in expected pain levels, desire for pain relief, or anxiety contribute to an increase in placebo analgesia over time as well as to determine whether placebo analgesic effects of IBS patients are related to endogenous opioid mechanisms. Twenty-six women with IBS were exposed to rectal stimulation (35 or 55 mmHg for 30 s) and tested under natural history (NH), rectal placebo (RP) and rectal lidocaine (RL) conditions. During all conditions, 16 patients were given saline intravenously (to test for a placebo effect) and 10 patients were given naloxone intravenously (to test naloxone antagonism of the placebo effect) on a double blind basis. Patients rated expected pain level, desire for pain relief and anxiety at 2 and 22 min after the onset of NH, RP, and RL conditions and they rated actual pain intensity at 5-min intervals for 40 min. There was a large and significant placebo effect (P<0.001) that increased over time. Ratings of expected pain levels, desire for pain relief and anxiety decreased over time and contributed to more variance in placebo and lidocaine responses during the last half of the session. These changes suggest that a reduction in negative emotions may be central to placebo effects. There was no significant difference between psychological mediators (desire, expectation, anxiety) or the placebo effect in the saline and naloxone groups, indicating that neither the psychological mediators nor the placebo analgesic effect were associated with endogenous opioids in this clinically related paradigm.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.pain.2005.03.014

Cites

29 of 29 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Vase, L., Robinson, M. E., Verne, N. G., & Price, D. D.
Affiliations
  • Aarhus University (DK)
  • University of Florida Health (US)
  • United States Department of Veterans Affairs (US)
  • University of Florida (US)
Corresponding author
Robinson, Michael E.
Venue
Pain
Published
2005-06
Volume
115
Issue
3
Pages
338-347
ISSN
0304-3959 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1996294605
Cited by
331
References
29
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 20 · 2019: 19 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 19 · 2016: 14 · 2015: 20 · 2014: 27 · 2013: 27 · 2012: 16
FWCI
8.14
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Pain (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Center for Complementary and Integrative Health (R01AT001424)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Pain Management and Placebo Effect
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Gastroenterology › Gastrointestinal motility and disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Complementary and alternative medicine › Acupuncture Treatment Research Studies
Keywords
placebo analgesia, irritable bowel syndrome, pain anticipation, anxiety, endogenous opioids, naloxone, rectal pain, psychological mediators
MeSH terms
Adult, Analgesia, Anesthetics, Local, Anxiety, Attitude to Health, Female, Humans, Lidocaine, Naloxone, Narcotic Antagonists, Pain, Pain Measurement, Predictive Value of Tests, Sodium Chloride, Placebo Effect, Opioid Peptides, Irritable Bowel Syndrome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review