The DOI matches its Crossref record; 41 of the 43 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Optimism lowers pain: Evidence of the causal status and underlying mechanisms
Open accessAbstract
Previous studies have demonstrated a relation between dispositional optimism and lower pain sensitivity, but the causal status of this link remains unclear. This study sought to test the causal status by experimentally inducing a temporary optimistic state by means of writing about and visualizing a future best possible self. In addition, we explored pain expectations and (situational) pain catastrophizing as possible underlying mechanisms of the link between optimism and pain. Seventy-nine university students participated in a cold pressor task (CPT). Before the CPT, half of them received the optimism manipulation and the other half a control manipulation. Induced optimism was related to lower pain intensity ratings during the CPT compared to the control group, thereby experimentally confirming causality. This effect was not explained by pain-related expectations about the task. Situational pain catastrophizing, however, did seem to mediate the relation between optimism and pain. This study is novel in that it confirms the causal status of optimism towards pain. Additionally, the results reveal that positive interventions might provide a useful alternative in reducing pain catastrophizing as an extremely relevant target in pain treatment.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The text we found for this paper looks like another document, so the self-check wasn’t run.
Citations
Cites
Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.51.6.1173 · Cited by 91,532
Fredrickson, B. L. (2001) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037//0003-066x.56.3.218 · Cited by 18,025
The Pain Catastrophizing Scale: Development and validation.
Sullivan, M. J. L., Bishop, S. R., & Pivik, J. (1995) · Psychological Assessment · doi:10.1037//1040-3590.7.4.524 · Cited by 8,227
Scheier, M. F., Carver, C. S., & Bridges, M. W. (1994) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037//0022-3514.67.6.1063 · Cited by 7,456
Optimism, coping, and health: Assessment and implications of generalized outcome expectancies.
Scheier, M. F., & Carver, C. S. (1985) · Health Psychology · doi:10.1037/0278-6133.4.3.219 · Cited by 6,690 · cited 1×
“The conceptualisation of dispositional optimism as a generalized positive outcome expectancy [32] and the previously established links between expected and perceived pain intensity [9,20,23] raised the possibility of a mediation model with expected pain intensity.”
BackgroundScheier, M. F., & Carver, C. S. (1992) · Cognitive Therapy and Research · doi:10.1007/bf01173489 · Cited by 2,220
Carver, C. S., Scheier, M. F., & Segerstrom, S. C. (2010) · Clinical Psychology Review · doi:10.1016/j.cpr.2010.01.006 · Cited by 2,051
Garland, E. L., Fredrickson, B., Kring, A. M., Johnson, D. P., Meyer, P. S., & Penn, D. L. (2010) · Clinical Psychology Review · doi:10.1016/j.cpr.2010.03.002 · Cited by 1,035
Psychological aspects of persistent pain: Current state of the science
Keefe, F. J., Rumble, M. E., Scipio, C. D., Giordano, L. A., & Perri, L. M. (2004) · The Journal of Pain · doi:10.1016/j.jpain.2004.02.576 · Cited by 954 · cited 1×
“Pain-specific negative appraisals [37] typically result in heightened levels of pain intensity [18,19,40].”
BackgroundSheldon, K. M., & Lyubomirsky, S. (2006) · The Journal of Positive Psychology · doi:10.1080/17439760500510676 · Cited by 925
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Carver, C. S., & Scheier, M. F. (2014) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2014.02.003 · Cited by 1,004
The fear-avoidance model of pain
Vlaeyen, J. W. S., Crombez, G., & Linton, S. J. (2016) · Pain · doi:10.1097/j.pain.0000000000000574 · Cited by 716
Self-citationEvaluating psychosocial contributions to chronic pain outcomes
Meints, S. M., & Edwards, R. R. (2018) · Progress in Neuro-Psychopharmacology and Biological Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/j.pnpbp.2018.01.017 · Cited by 719
Can psychological interventions increase optimism? A meta-analysis
Malouff, J. M., & Schutte, N. S. (2016) · The Journal of Positive Psychology · doi:10.1080/17439760.2016.1221122 · Cited by 367
Laferton, J. A. C., Kube, T., Salzmann, S., Auer, C. J., & Shedden-Mora, M. C. (2017) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00233 · Cited by 267
Metadata
- Authors
- Hanssen, M. M., Peters, M. L., Vlaeyen, J. W. S., Meevissen, Y. M. C., & Vancleef, L. M. G.
- Affiliations
- Maastricht University (NL)
- Corresponding author
- Hanssen, Marjolein M.
- Venue
- Pain
- Published
- 2013-01
- Volume
- 154
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 53-58
- ISSN
- 0304-3959 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2101216163
- Cited by
- 202
- References
- 43
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 19 · 2017: 22 · 2016: 18 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 24 · 2013: 12
- FWCI
- 21.51
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- Licence
- Locations
- Pain (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Research Publications (Maastricht University) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
- Lirias (KU Leuven) (submittedVersion)
- Research Publications (Maastricht University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Optimism, Hope, and Well-being
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Pain Management and Placebo Effect
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Pediatric Pain Management Techniques
- Keywords
- dispositional optimism, pain sensitivity, pain intensity, pain catastrophizing, pain anticipation, best possible self, cold pressor task, mediation
- MeSH terms
- Adolescent, Adult, Affect, Blood Pressure, Cold Temperature, Female, Humans, Male, Pain Measurement, Personality, Pain Threshold, Imagery, Psychotherapy, Young Adult, Catastrophization
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
