The DOI matches its Crossref record; 64 of the 64 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Neonatal pain-related stress, functional cortical activity and visual-perceptual abilities in school-age children born at extremely low gestational age
Open accessAbstract
Children born very prematurely (< or =32 weeks) often exhibit visual-perceptual difficulties at school-age, even in the absence of major neurological impairment. The alterations in functional brain activity that give rise to such problems, as well as the relationship between adverse neonatal experience and neurodevelopment, remain poorly understood. Repeated procedural pain-related stress during neonatal intensive care has been proposed to contribute to altered neurocognitive development in these children. Due to critical periods in the development of thalamocortical systems, the immature brain of infants born at extremely low gestational age (ELGA; < or =28 weeks) may have heightened vulnerability to neonatal pain. In a cohort of school-age children followed since birth we assessed relations between functional brain activity measured using magnetoencephalogragy (MEG), visual-perceptual abilities and cumulative neonatal pain. We demonstrated alterations in the spectral structure of spontaneous cortical oscillatory activity in ELGA children at school-age. Cumulative neonatal pain-related stress was associated with changes in background cortical rhythmicity in these children, and these alterations in spontaneous brain oscillations were negatively correlated with visual-perceptual abilities at school-age, and were not driven by potentially confounding neonatal variables. These findings provide the first evidence linking neonatal pain-related stress, the development of functional brain activity, and school-age cognitive outcome in these vulnerable children.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Papile, L.-A., Burstein, J., Burstein, R., & Koffler, H. (1978) · The Journal of Pediatrics · doi:10.1016/s0022-3476(78)80282-0 · Cited by 6,430
The brainweb: phase synchronization and large-scale integration
Varela, F., Lachaux, J.-P., Rodriguez, E., & Martinerie, J. (2001) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/35067550 · Cited by 4,761
EEG alpha oscillations: The inhibition–timing hypothesis
Klimesch, W., Sauseng, P., & Hanslmayr, S. (2007) · Brain Research Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.brainresrev.2006.06.003 · Cited by 3,891
Shaping Functional Architecture by Oscillatory Alpha Activity: Gating by Inhibition
Jensen, O., & Mazaheri, A. (2010) · Frontiers in Human Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnhum.2010.00186 · Cited by 3,237
Llinás, R. R., Ribary, U., Jeanmonod, D., Kronberg, E., & Mitra, P. P. (1999) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.96.26.15222 · Cited by 1,388
Self-citationNormal and pathological oscillatory communication in the brain
Schnitzler, A., & Gross, J. (2005) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn1650 · Cited by 1,247
Human gamma-frequency oscillations associated with attention and memory
Jensen, O., Kaiser, J., & Lachaux, J.-P. (2007) · Trends in Neurosciences · doi:10.1016/j.tins.2007.05.001 · Cited by 1,245
Pfurtscheller, G., Stancák, A., & Neuper, C. (1996) · International Journal of Psychophysiology · doi:10.1016/s0167-8760(96)00066-9 · Cited by 1,205
Fries, P., Nikolić, D., & Singer, W. (2007) · Trends in Neurosciences · doi:10.1016/j.tins.2007.05.005 · Cited by 1,044
Synchronous neural oscillations and cognitive processes
Ward, L. M. (2003) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2003.10.012 · Cited by 1,009
Cited by
Brain injury in premature neonates: A primary cerebral dysmaturation disorder?
Back, S. A., & Miller, S. P. (2014) · Annals of Neurology · doi:10.1002/ana.24132 · Cited by 360
Self-citationPain vulnerability: a neurobiological perspective
Denk, F., McMahon, S. B., & Tracey, I. (2014) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nn.3628 · Cited by 363
Dysmaturation of Premature Brain: Importance, Cellular Mechanisms, and Potential Interventions
Volpe, J. J. (2019) · Pediatric Neurology · doi:10.1016/j.pediatrneurol.2019.02.016 · Cited by 359
Eckstein Grunau, R. (2013) · Rambam Maimonides Medical Journal · doi:10.5041/rmmj.10132 · Cited by 353
Ranger, M., Chau, C. M. Y., Garg, A., Woodward, T. S., Beg, M. F., Bjornson, B., Poskitt, K., Fitzpatrick, K., Synnes, A. R., Miller, S. P., et al. (2013) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0076702 · Cited by 288
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Doesburg, S. M., Chau, C. M., Cheung, T. P. L., Moiseev, A., Ribary, U., Herdman, A. T., Miller, S. P., Cepeda, I. L., Synnes, A., & Grunau, R. E.
- Venue
- Pain
- Published
- 2013-10
- Volume
- 154
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 1946-1952
- ISSN
- 0304-3959 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2024707937
- Cited by
- 272
- References
- 64
- FWCI
- 19.29
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Neonatal pain-related stress, functional cortical activity and visual-perceptual abilities in school-age children born at extremely low gestational age. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.pain.2013.04.009
- The paper
- Doesburg, S. M., Chau, C. M., Cheung, T. P. L., Moiseev, A., Ribary, U., Herdman, A. T., Miller, S. P., Cepeda, I. L., Synnes, A., & Grunau, R. E. (2013). Neonatal pain-related stress, functional cortical activity and visual-perceptual abilities in school-age children born at extremely low gestational age. Pain. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pain.2013.04.009
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.