Cited by 41Pancreatic and Hepatic Oncology ResearchPancreatitis Pathology and TreatmentMRI in cancer diagnosis

Focal pancreatic parenchyma atrophy is a harbinger of pancreatic cancer and a clue to the intraductal spreading subtype

Open access
Nakahodo, Jun, Kikuyama, Masataka, Fukumura, Yuki, Horiguchi, Shin-ichiro, Chiba, Kazuro, Tabata, Hiroki, Suzuki, Mizuka, Kamisawa, Terumi·2022·Pancreatology

Abstract

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES: Radiological evidence of focal pancreatic parenchymal atrophy (FPPA) may presage early pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) development. We aimed to clarify the incidence of FPPA and the clinicopathological features of PDAC with FPPA before diagnosis. METHODS: Data on endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle biopsies and surgical samples from 170 patients with pancreatic cancer histologically diagnosed between 2014 and 2019 were extracted from the pathology database of Komagome Hospital and Juntendo University hospital and retrospectively evaluated together with 51 patients without PDAC. RESULTS: FPPA was identified in 47/170 (28%) patients before PDAC diagnosis and in 2/51 (4%) patients in the control group (P < 0.01). The median duration from FPPA detection to diagnosis was 35 (interquartile range [IQR]:16-63) months. In 24/47 (51%) patients with FPPA, the atrophic area resolved. The lesion was in the head and body/tail in 7/40 and 67/56 of the patients with (n = 47) and without FPPA (n = 123), respectively (P < 0.001). Histopathologically confirmed non-invasive lesions in the main pancreatic duct and a positive surgical margin in the resected specimens occurred in 53% vs. 21% (P = 0.078) and 29% vs. 3% (P = 0.001) of the groups, respectively. The PDAC patients with FPPA accompanied by a malignant pancreatic resection margin had high-grade pancreatic intraepithelial neoplasia. CONCLUSIONS: FPPA occurred in 28% of the PDAC group at 35 months prediagnosis. The FPPA area resolved before PDAC onset. Benchmarking previous images of the pancreas with the focus on FPPA may enable prediction of PDAC. PDAC with FPPA involves widespread high-grade pancreatic intraepithelial neoplasia requiring a wide surgical margin for surgical excision.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.pan.2022.10.003

Cites

31 of 31 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Nakahodo, J., Kikuyama, M., Fukumura, Y., Horiguchi, S.-I., Chiba, K., Tabata, H., Suzuki, M., & Kamisawa, T.
Affiliations
  • Tokyo Metropolitan Komagome Hospital (JP)
  • Juntendo University (JP)
Corresponding author
Nakahodo, Jun
Venue
Pancreatology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2022-12
Volume
22
Issue
8
Pages
1148-1158
ISSN
1424-3903 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4306393967
Cited by
41
References
31
Citations by year
2026: 13 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 5
FWCI
2.94
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Pancreatology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Pancreatic and Hepatic Oncology Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Pancreatitis Pathology and Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › MRI in cancer diagnosis
Keywords
pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma, pancreatic intraepithelial neoplasia, surgical resection margin, endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle biopsy
MeSH terms
Atrophy, Humans, Pancreas, Pancreatic Neoplasms, Retrospective Studies, Carcinoma, Pancreatic Ductal

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review