Cited by 13Pancreatic and Hepatic Oncology ResearchPancreatitis Pathology and TreatmentGenetic factors in colorectal cancer

Dilatation of the main pancreatic duct as first manifestation of small pancreatic ductal adenocarcinomas detected in a hereditary pancreatic cancer surveillance program

Open access
Vasen, Hans F.A., Boekestijn, Bas, Ibrahim, Isaura S., Inderson, Akin, Bonsing, Bert A., de Vos tot Nederveen Cappel, Wouter H., Feshtali, Shirin, Wasser, Martin N.·2019·HPB

Abstract

Background MRI surveillance in a cohort of CDKN2A-p16-Leiden mutation carriers with a 20% lifetime risk of PDAC led to increased resection rates and improved survival. Patients with screen-detected PDAC were evaluated for main pancreatic duct (MPD) abnormalities in this retrospective review. Methods Since 2000 annual MRI and optional EUS was performed in mutation carriers. Data of patients with screen-detected PDAC was collected on gender, age at diagnosis, site of tumor, size, outcome of surgery, pathology findings and survival. All MRIs were re-evaluated for MPD abnormalities. Results 23 PDAC were detected in 22 (10%) of 217 mutation carriers, 10 (45%) males and 12 (55%) females. The mean age at diagnosis was 59.8 years (range 39.2-74.3 years). Revision of the MRI/MRCP revealed a lesion and dilatation of the MPD in 8 of the 22 patients. In 5 of 7 patients with PDAC detected during follow-up, the previous MRI showed MPD dilatation without evidence of tumor. The mean size of PDAC was 12.3 mm (range 5-19 mm). All tumors were resectable. Conclusion MPD dilation is common in patients with screen-detected PDAC. Abnormalities on MRI during surveillance of high-risk individuals requires intense follow-up or prompt treatment, as early treatment results in a better prognosis.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.hpb.2019.02.013

Cites

17 of 17 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Vasen, H. F. A., Boekestijn, B., Ibrahim, I. S., Inderson, A., Bonsing, B. A., de Vos tot Nederveen Cappel, W. H., Feshtali, S., & Wasser, M. N.
Affiliations
Leiden University Medical Center (NL)
Corresponding author
Boekestijn, Bas
Venue
HPB
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2019-10
Volume
21
Issue
10
Pages
1371-1375
ISSN
1365-182X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2948081259
Cited by
12
References
17
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2
FWCI
0.42
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • HPB (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
  • Leiden Repository (Leiden University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Pancreatic and Hepatic Oncology Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Pancreatitis Pathology and Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Genetic factors in colorectal cancer
Keywords
pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma, main pancreatic duct dilatation, hereditary pancreatic cancer, MRI surveillance, MRCP, early cancer detection, pancreatic cancer screening, tumor resectability
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Carcinoma, Dilatation, Pathologic, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Mass Screening, Middle Aged, Pancreatic Ducts, Pancreatic Neoplasms, Prognosis, Retrospective Studies, Carcinoma, Pancreatic Ductal, Early Detection of Cancer

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review