Cited by 284Video Surveillance and Tracking MethodsAdvanced Image and Video Retrieval TechniquesAdvanced Neural Network Applications

Sparse coding based visual tracking: Review and experimental comparison

Zhang, Shengping, Yao, Hongxun, Sun, Xin, Lu, Xiusheng·2013·Pattern Recognition

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.patcog.2012.10.006

Cites

73 of 73 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Zhang, S., Yao, H., Sun, X., & Lu, X.
Affiliations
Harbin Institute of Technology (CN)
Corresponding author
Yao, Hongxun
Venue
Pattern Recognition
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2013-07
Volume
46
Issue
7
Pages
1772-1788
ISSN
0031-3203 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2121609805
Cited by
284
References
73
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 25 · 2018: 32 · 2017: 43 · 2016: 39 · 2015: 46 · 2014: 48 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 1
FWCI
34.59
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Pattern Recognition (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China
  • Harbin Institute of Technology
  • H2020 Marie Skłodowska-Curie Actions
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Video Surveillance and Tracking Methods
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Image and Video Retrieval Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Neural Network Applications
Keywords
sparse coding, visual object tracking, discriminative dictionary, occlusion, l1-norm minimization, L2 norm minimization

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review