Cited by 601Domain Adaptation and Few-Shot LearningAdvanced Neural Network ApplicationsGenerative Adversarial Networks and Image Synthesis

Adaptive batch normalization for practical domain adaptation

Li, Yanghao, Wang, Naiyan, Shi, Jianping, Hou, Xiaodi, Liu, Jiaying·2018·Pattern Recognition

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.patcog.2018.03.005

Cites

48 of 48 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Li, Y., Wang, N., Shi, J., Hou, X., & Liu, J.
Affiliations
  • Peking University (CN)
  • Tusimple (United States) (US)
  • Sensetime (China) (CN)
Corresponding author
Liu, Jiaying
Venue
Pattern Recognition
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2018-08
Volume
80
Pages
109-117
ISSN
0031-3203 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2793888044
Cited by
601
References
48
Citations by year
2026: 62 · 2025: 68 · 2024: 81 · 2023: 89 · 2022: 98 · 2021: 87 · 2020: 71 · 2019: 37 · 2018: 8
FWCI
28.57
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Pattern Recognition (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Natural Science Foundation of China (61772043)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Domain Adaptation and Few-Shot Learning
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Neural Network Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Generative Adversarial Networks and Image Synthesis
Keywords
domain adaptation, adaptive batch normalization, batch normalization, deep neural network, generalization, transfer learning

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review