Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 16

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Lower but not higher doses of transdermal nicotine facilitate cognitive performance in smokers on gender non-preferred tasks

Poltavski, Dmitri V., Petros, Thomas V., Holm, Jeffrey E.·2012·Pharmacology Biochemistry and Behavior
DOI 10.1016/j.pbb.2012.06.003
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.pbb.2012.06.003

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 50

  1. Algan, 1997, Effects of tobacco smoking and gender on interhemispheric cognitive function: performance and confidence measures, Behav Pharmacol, 8, 416, 10.1097/00008877-199710000-00006 · DOI
  2. Audrain, 1995, Relationship between obesity and the metabolic effects of smoking in women, Health Psychol, 14, 116, 10.1037/0278-6133.14.2.116 · DOI
  3. Bekker, 2005, Acute effects of nicotine on attention and response inhibition, Pharmacol Biochem Behav, 82, 539, 10.1016/j.pbb.2005.10.009 · DOI
  4. Benowitz, 1996, Pharmacology of nicotine: addiction and therapeutics, Annu Rev, 36, 597
  5. Benowitz, 1991, Stable isotope method for studying transdermal drug absorption: the nicotine patch, Clin Pharmacol Ther, 50, 286, 10.1038/clpt.1991.138 · DOI
  6. Berenbaum, 1997, Role of the hippocampus in verbal: memory outcome following left anterior temporal lobectomy, Neuropsychology, 11, 585, 10.1037/0894-4105.11.4.585 · DOI
  7. Botella-Carretero, 2004, Weight gain and cardiovascular risk factors during smoking cessation with bupropion or nicotine, Horm Metab Res, 36, 178, 10.1055/s-2004-814343 · DOI
  8. Burton, 2000, Use of FDA-approved pharmacologic treatments for tobacco dependence—United States, 1984–1998, Morb Mortal Wkly Rep, 49, 665
  9. Burton, 2004, Gender differences in implicit and explicit memory for affective passages, Brain Cogn, 54, 218, 10.1016/j.bandc.2004.02.011 · DOI
  10. Cahill, 2003, Sex- and hemisphere-related influences on the neurobiology of emotionally influenced memory, Prog Neuro-Psychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry, 27, 1235, 10.1016/j.pnpbp.2003.09.019 · DOI · Paper page
  11. Colamussi, 2007, Stress-and cue-induced cigarette craving: effects of a family history of smoking, Drug Alcohol Depend, 88, 251, 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2006.11.006 · DOI
  12. Conroy, 2007, Normative variation of P3a and P3b from a large sample: gender, topography, and response time, J Psychophysiol, 21, 22, 10.1027/0269-8803.21.1.22 · DOI
  13. Davis, 1994, Self-administered nicotine-dependence scale (SANDS): item selection, reliability estimation, and initial validation, J Clin Psychol, 50, 918, 10.1002/1097-4679(199411)50:6<918::AID-JCLP2270500617>3.0.CO;2-6 · DOI
  14. Ferguson, 2006, Does reducing withdrawal severity mediate nicotine patch efficacy? A randomized clinical trial, J Consult Clin Psychol, 74, 1153, 10.1037/0022-006X.74.6.1153 · DOI · Paper page
  15. File, 2002, Mood differences between male and female light smokers and non-smokers, Pharmacol Biochem Behav, 72, 681, 10.1016/S0091-3057(02)00733-5 · DOI
  16. Franklin, 2004, Retrospective study: influence of menstrual cycle on cue-induced cigarette craving, Nicotine Tob Res, 6, 171, 10.1080/14622200310001656984 · DOI
  17. Gourlay, 1994, Prospective study of factors predicting outcome of transdermal nicotine treatment in smoking cessation, Br Med J, 309, 1437, 10.1136/bmj.309.6958.842 · DOI
  18. Gross, 1993, Nicotine abstinence produces content-specific Stroop interference, Psychopharmacology (Berl), 110, 333, 10.1007/BF02251289 · DOI · Paper page
  19. Heatherton, 1991, The Fagerstrom test for nicotine dependence: a revision of the Fagerstrom tolerance questionnaire, Br J Addict, 86, 1119, 10.1111/j.1360-0443.1991.tb01879.x · DOI · Paper page
  20. Heishman, 2003, Tobacco craving questionnaire: reliability and validity of a new multifactorial instrument, Nicotine Tob Res, 5, 645, 10.1080/1462220031000158681 · DOI
  21. Herlitz, 1997, Gender differences in episodic memory, Mem Cognit, 25, 801, 10.3758/BF03211324 · DOI
  22. Hultsch, 1991, Adult age differences in direct and indirect tests of memory, J Gerontol Psychol Sci, 46, 22, 10.1093/geronj/46.1.P22 · DOI
  23. Kleykamp, 2011, Effects of transdermal nicotine and concurrent smoking on cognitive performance in tobacco-abstinent smokers, Exp Clin Psychopharmacol, 19, 75, 10.1037/a0022417 · DOI
  24. Kollins, 2009, Effects of smoking abstinence on reaction time variability in smokers with and without ADHD: an ex-Gaussian analysis, Drug Alcohol Depend, 100, 169, 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2008.09.019 · DOI
  25. Kramer, 1997, Developmental sex differences in verbal learning, Neuropsychology, 11, 577, 10.1037/0894-4105.11.4.577 · DOI
  26. Krebs, 1994, Effects of smoking on memory for prose passages, Physiol Behav, 4, 723, 10.1016/0031-9384(94)90233-X · DOI
  27. Landers, 1992, The effects of smokeless tobacco on performance and psychophysiological response, Med Sci Sports Exerc, 24, 895, 10.1249/00005768-199208000-00011 · DOI
  28. Lynn, 2008, Sex differences in mental arithmetic, digit span, and g defined as working memory capacity, Intelligence, 36, 226, 10.1016/j.intell.2007.06.002 · DOI
  29. Mendrek, 2006, Working memory in cigarette smokers: comparison to non-smokers and effects of abstinence, Addict Behav, 31, 833, 10.1016/j.addbeh.2005.06.009 · DOI
  30. Newhouse, 2004, Effects of nicotinic stimulation on cognitive performance, Curr Opin Pharmacol, 4, 36, 10.1016/j.coph.2003.11.001 · DOI
  31. Nyborg, 2005, Sex-related differences in general intelligence g, brain size, and social status, Pers Individ Differ, 39, 497, 10.1016/j.paid.2004.12.011 · DOI
  32. Patterson, 2010, Working memory deficits predict short-term smoking resumption following brief abstinence, Drug Alcohol Depend, 106, 61, 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2009.07.020 · DOI
  33. Perkins, 1996, Sex differences in nicotine versus non-nicotine reinforcement as determinants of tobacco smoking, Exp Clin Psychopharmacol, 4, 166, 10.1037/1064-1297.4.2.166 · DOI
  34. Perkins, 2001, Smoking cessation in women: special considerations, CNS Drugs, 15, 391, 10.2165/00023210-200115050-00005 · DOI
  35. Perkins, 1999, Sex differences in nicotine effects and self-administration: review of human and animal evidence, Nicotine Tob Res, 1, 301, 10.1080/14622299050011431 · DOI
  36. Perkins, 2002, Sex differences in the subjective and reinforcing effects of cigarette nicotine dose, Psychopharmacology (Berl), 163, 94, 10.1007/s00213-002-1168-1 · DOI
  37. Perkins, 2006, Sex differences in the influence of nicotine dose instructions on the reinforcing and self-reported rewarding effects of smoking, Psychopharmacology (Berl), 184, 600, 10.1007/s00213-005-0103-7 · DOI
  38. Poltavski, 2005, Effects of transdermal nicotine on prose memory and attention in smokers and nonsmokers, Physiol Behav, 83, 833, 10.1016/j.physbeh.2004.10.005 · DOI
  39. Poltavski, 2006, Effects of transdermal nicotine on attention in adult non-smokers with and without attentional deficits, Physiol Behav, 87, 614, 10.1016/j.physbeh.2005.12.011 · DOI
  40. Sakurai, 2002, Acute effects of cigarettes in non-deprived smokers on memory, calculation and executive functions, Hum Psychopharmacol, 17, 369, 10.1002/hup.424 · DOI
  41. Sass, 2010, Time course of attentional bias in anxiety: emotion and gender specificity, Psychophysiology, 47, 247, 10.1111/j.1469-8986.2009.00926.x · DOI
  42. Sayette, 1995, Urge and affect: a facial coding analysis of smokers, Exp Clin Psychopharmacol, 3, 417, 10.1037/1064-1297.3.4.417 · DOI
  43. Schneider, 1996, Clinical pharmacokinetics of nasal nicotine delivery. A review and comparison to other nicotine systems, Clin Pharmacokinet, 31, 65, 10.2165/00003088-199631010-00005 · DOI
  44. Shiffman, 2005, Nicotine patch and lozenge are effective for women, Nicotine Tob Res, 1, 119, 10.1080/14622200412331328439 · DOI
  45. Silagy, 2004, Nicotine replacement therapy for smoking cessation (review), Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 3, 1
  46. Strauss, 2005, Test-retest reliability of standard and emotional stroop tasks: an investigation of color-word and picture-word versions, Assessment, 12, 330, 10.1177/1073191105276375 · DOI
  47. Swan, 1997, Subgroups of smokers with different success rates after use of transdermal nicotine, Addiction, 92, 207, 10.1111/j.1360-0443.1997.tb03653.x · DOI
  48. Trimmel, 2004, Effects of transdermally administered nicotine on aspects of attention, task load, and mood in women and men, Pharmacol Biochem Behav, 78, 639, 10.1016/j.pbb.2004.04.030 · DOI
  49. West, 2001, Individual differences in preferences for and responses to four nicotine replacement products, Psychopharmacology (Berl), 153, 225, 10.1007/s002130000577 · DOI
  50. Wetter, 1999, Gender differences in smoking cessation, J Consult Clin Psychol, 67, 555, 10.1037/0022-006X.67.4.555 · DOI

Cited by

See all 16

Metadata

Authors
Poltavski, D. V., Petros, T. V., & Holm, J. E.
Venue
Pharmacology Biochemistry and Behavior
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2012-09
Volume
102
Issue
3
Pages
423-433
ISSN
0091-3057
DOI
10.1016/j.pbb.2012.06.003
Cited by
16
References
6
Language
en
Licence
Funders
University of North Dakota

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.