The DOI matches its Crossref record; 44 of the 44 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Endophyte or parasite – what decides?
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Plant sesquiterpenes induce hyphal branching in arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi
Akiyama, K., Matsuzaki, K.-I., & Hayashi, H. (2005) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature03608 · Cited by 2,429
Functioning of mycorrhizal associations along the mutualism–parasitism continuum*
JOHNSON, N. C., GRAHAM, J., & SMITH, F. A. (1997) · New Phytologist · doi:10.1046/j.1469-8137.1997.00729.x · Cited by 2,020
Schulz, B., & Boyle, C. (2005) · Mycological Research · doi:10.1017/s095375620500273x · Cited by 1,467
Fungal endophytes limit pathogen damage in a tropical tree
Arnold, A. E., Mejía, L. C., Kyllo, D., Rojas, E. I., Maynard, Z., Robbins, N., & Herre, E. A. (2003) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.2533483100 · Cited by 1,400
Waller, F., Achatz, B., Baltruschat, H., Fodor, J., Becker, K., Fischer, M., Heier, T., Hückelhoven, R., Neumann, C., von Wettstein, D., et al. (2005) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0504423102 · Cited by 1,324
Self-citationGlomalean Fungi from the Ordovician
Redecker, D., Kodner, R., & Graham, L. E. (2000) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.289.5486.1920 · Cited by 1,171
Mycorrhizal Fungi Can Dominate Phosphate Supply to Plants Irrespective of Growth Responses
Smith, S. E., Smith, F. A., & Jakobsen, I. (2003) · Plant Physiology · doi:10.1104/pp.103.024380 · Cited by 1,007
SNARE-protein-mediated disease resistance at the plant cell wall
Collins, N. C., Thordal-Christensen, H., Lipka, V., Bau, S., Kombrink, E., Qiu, J.-L., Hückelhoven, R., Stein, M., Freialdenhoven, A., Somerville, S. C., et al. (2003) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature02076 · Cited by 982
Self-citationA plant receptor-like kinase required for both bacterial and fungal symbiosis
Stracke, S., Kistner, C., Yoshida, S., Mulder, L., Sato, S., Kaneko, T., Tabata, S., Sandal, N., Stougaard, J., Szczyglowski, K., et al. (2002) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature00841 · Cited by 951
SIGNALING IN THE ARBUSCULAR MYCORRHIZAL SYMBIOSIS
Harrison, M. J. (2005) · Annual Review of Microbiology · doi:10.1146/annurev.micro.58.030603.123749 · Cited by 785
Cited by
The Soil Microbiome Influences Grapevine-Associated Microbiota
Zarraonaindia, I., Owens, S. M., Weisenhorn, P., West, K., Hampton-Marcell, J., Lax, S., Bokulich, N. A., Mills, D. A., Martin, G., Taghavi, S., et al. (2015) · mBio · doi:10.1128/mbio.02527-14 · Cited by 990
Moving beyond assumptions to understand abundance distributions across the ranges of species
Sagarin, R. D., Gaines, S. D., & Gaylord, B. (2006) · Trends in Ecology & Evolution · doi:10.1016/j.tree.2006.06.008 · Cited by 507
Mechanisms of fungal endophytes in plant protection against pathogens
Gao, F.-K., Dai, C., & Liu, X. (2010) · African Journal of Microbiology Research · doi:10.5897/ajmr.9000480 · Cited by 299
Piriformospora indica, a cultivable root endophyte with multiple biotechnological applications
Oelmüller, R., Sherameti, I., Tripathi, S., & Varma, A. (2009) · Symbiosis · doi:10.1007/s13199-009-0009-y · Cited by 278
Pimentel, M. R., Molina, G., Dionísio, A. P., Maróstica Junior, M. R., & Pastore, G. M. (2011) · Biotechnology Research International · doi:10.4061/2011/576286 · Cited by 277
Metadata
- Authors
- Kogel, K.-H., Franken, P., & Hückelhoven, R.
- Venue
- Current Opinion in Plant Biology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2006-08
- Volume
- 9
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 358-363
- ISSN
- 1369-5266 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2132149755
- Cited by
- 440
- References
- 44
- FWCI
- 2.06
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Endophyte or parasite – what decides? https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.pbi.2006.05.001
- The paper
- Kogel, K.-H., Franken, P., & Hückelhoven, R. (2006). Endophyte or parasite – what decides? Current Opinion in Plant Biology. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pbi.2006.05.001
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
