Cited by 30Mobile Health and mHealth ApplicationsPhysical Activity and HealthDiabetes Management and Research

Technology-based and supervised exercise interventions for individuals with type 2 diabetes: randomized controlled trial

Timurtas, Eren, Inceer, Mehmet, Mayo, Nancy, Karabacak, Neslihan, Sertbas, Yasar, Polat, Mine Gulden·2022·Primary care diabetes

Abstract

Aims The purpose of this study was to estimate, for people with type 2 diabetes (T2D), the extent to which glycemic control was affected by a 12-week program using mobile app and wearable smartwatch in comparison to supervised exercise training.Methods This study was a stratified, randomized, assessor-blind, controlled, pragmatic trial with three parallel groups which were supervised, mobile app and wearable smartwatch. Individually tailored exercise regimens delivered through a supervisor, mobile app and wearable smartwatch. Programs consisted of aerobic, resistance exercises, calisthenic, flexibility, balance, and coordination exercises. Primary outcome was change in glycemic control (HbA1c); secondary outcome was Six Minute Walk Test; and explanatory outcomes were exercise behaviour, muscle function, and physical capacity. The groups were contrasted for change in HbA1c and absolute reduction of ≥0.5% (Minimal Important Change). Linear and logistic regressions were used to compare the groups and generalized estimated equations were used to analyze the explanatory outcomes.Results In total, 90 people were randomized, 6 were lost over 12 weeks, leaving 84 with outcome data. The difference in HbA1c did not differ between the supervised and the technology groups combined and between the mobile app and smartwatch group. Proportions of people achieving a clinically meaningful difference on HbA1c between the supervised and technology groups were similar (46% vs 43%) and the associated OR was 0.87 (95%CI:0.34-2.28). Within the two technology groups, proportions of people achieving a clinically meaningful difference in HbA1c were 48% in the mobile app and 38% in the smartwatch groups and the associated OR was 0.65 (95%CI:0.21-2.03). The groups did not differ on secondary and explanatory outcomes.Conclusions The results of our trial provide evidence that all outcomes have improved in all groups regardless of the exercise delivery method. Considering the supervised programs are not available for everybody, technological options are crucial to implement to help individuals self-manage most aspects of their diabetes.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.pcd.2021.12.005

Cites

51 of 51 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

2 retracted

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Timurtas, E., Inceer, M., Mayo, N., Karabacak, N., Sertbas, Y., & Polat, M. G.
Affiliations
  • McGill University Health Centre (CA)
  • Marmara University (TR)
Corresponding author
  • Inceer, Mehmet
  • Mayo, Nancy
  • Karabacak, Neslihan
Venue
Primary care diabetes
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2022-02
Volume
16
Issue
1
Pages
49-56
ISSN
1751-9918 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4200035234
Cited by
30
References
51
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 5
FWCI
4.80
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Primary care diabetes (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Dspace Repository (Marmara Üniversitesi) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mobile Health and mHealth Applications
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Physical Activity and Health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Research
Keywords
type 2 diabetes, glycemic control, HbA1c, supervised exercise, mobile health apps, smartwatches, exercise intervention, diabetes self-management, exercise behavior, muscle function, physical capacity, minimal important change
MeSH terms
Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Exercise Therapy, Humans, Technology, Exercise, Mobile Applications

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review