Cited by 119Urban and Rural Development ChallengesWastewater Treatment and ReuseGender Studies and Social Issues

Communal sanitation alternatives for slums: A case study of Kibera, Kenya

Schouten, M.A.C., Mathenge, R.W.·2010·Physics and Chemistry of the Earth, Parts A/B/C

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.pce.2010.07.002

Cites

25 of 25 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

1 retracted

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 27 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Schouten, M. A. C., & Mathenge, R. W.
Affiliations
  • IHE Delft Institute for Water Education (NL)
  • Government of Kenya (KE)
Corresponding author
Schouten, M.A.C.
Venue
Physics and Chemistry of the Earth, Parts A/B/C
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2010-01
Volume
35
Issue
13-14
Pages
815-822
ISSN
1474-7065 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2001425804
Cited by
119
References
27
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 16 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 4
FWCI
24.73
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Physics and Chemistry of the Earth Parts A/B/C (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Urban Studies › Urban and Rural Development Challenges
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Waste Management and Disposal › Wastewater Treatment and Reuse
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender Studies and Social Issues
Keywords
slum sanitation, Kibera, stakeholder expectations, user expectations, non-governmental organizations

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review