Cited by 76Gender Studies and Social IssuesUrban and Rural Development ChallengesGender, Education, and Development Issues

No relief: Lived experiences of inadequate sanitation access of poor urban women in India.

Open access
Kulkarni, Seema, O’Reilly, Kathleen, Bhat, Sneha·2017·Gender & Development

Abstract

The provision of sanitation in India has attracted much attention, but research and policies focusing on gender in relation to sanitation often fail to focus on sanitation-related violence against women (VAW). This article focuses on research in Pune (in Maharashtra) and Jaipur (in Rajasthan). It offers evidence of slum-dwelling women’s experiences of harassment and violence related to poor or absent sanitation facilities. In addition, it explores the strategies that women adopt to minimise risk and stress. Sanitation-related violence shows the connections between slum geographies and unequal intra-slum relationships of gender, caste, and economic and marital status, and the types of sanitation facilities available. These different identities shape women’s experiences of VAW and they commonly blame men from ‘outside’ or ‘other’ groups, affecting their ability to act as a united group against violence. While sanitation is inadequate and inappropriate for women’s needs across castes, community cohesion and the chances of collective action and advocacy to address sanitation needs are also compromised by tensions between groups in the slum.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/13552074.2017.1331531

Cites

13 of 13 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Family members (often husbands, fathers, and in-laws) restricted water fetching and sanitation-related movements, most intensely for unmarried daughters and recently married and pregnant women, less intensely for women of lower castes and widows.

    “Research in India found that family members (often husbands, fathers, and in-laws) restricted water fetching and sanitation-related movements, most intensely for unmarried daughters [174,182,190] and recently married and pregnant women, [178, 182, 189] (less intensely for women of lower castes [135] and widows [174]).”
  • Movement restrictions influenced women and girls' access to water and defecation, urination, and menstrual management locations, and are most widely reported in India.

    “Movement restrictions influenced women and girls' access to water [101, 110, 178] and defecation, urination, and menstrual management locations, and are most widely reported in India [62, 135, 174, 181, 182, 184, 187], [101,110,187,[189][190][191].”
  • Families have built latrines specifically to restrict movement, though women do not always have access when needed if situated in spaces controlled by men.

    “Families have built latrines specifically to restrict movement, [62,174] though women do not always have access when needed if situated in spaces controlled by men [62].”
  • Fear and experiences of sexual violence were reported by women and girls who had to leave home for water and sanitation needs; women openly defecating were particularly vulnerable to non-partner sexual violence compared to those using latrines.

    “Fear and experiences of sexual violence were reported by women and girls who had to leave home for water and sanitation needs (_((((xxx))))_)[70, 76, 108, 123, 135, 143, 153, 171, 173-175, 177, 179, 181, 183, 184, 186-189, 191, 198, 214, 231, 233, 238-240, 255, 258, 259, 261, 265, 268-270] Research from India, [181, 268] Kenya, [269] and Nigeria [70] found women openly defecating were particularly”
  • General and sexual harassment are more frequently observed/documented in sanitation than water research.

    “General harassment, including taunting, teasing, name calling, and throwing things at women or girls is more frequently observed in sanitation [138, 168, 174, 175, 181, 187, 190, 263] than water research [168,199] Sexual harassment, including verbal harassment, peeping, flashing, and male masturbation is also more frequently documented in sanitation [171-174, 189, 190, 214, 217, 226, 231, 233]”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kulkarni, S., O’Reilly, K., & Bhat, S.
Affiliations
Texas A&M University (US)
Corresponding author
Kulkarni, Seema
Venue
Gender & Development
Published
2017-05-04
Volume
25
Issue
2
Pages
167-183
ISSN
  • 1355-2074 (ISSN-L)
  • 1364-9221
OpenAlex
W2735016030
Cited by
76
References
13
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 5
FWCI
7.45
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
Gender & Development (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender Studies and Social Issues
  • Social Sciences › Urban Studies › Urban and Rural Development Challenges
  • Social Sciences › Education › Gender, Education, and Development Issues
Keywords
violence against women, urban poverty, gender inequality, caste, collective action, community cohesion, women's coping strategies, Pune, Jaipur

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review