Cited by 166Asthma and respiratory diseasesRespiratory and Cough-Related ResearchPsychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments

The prevalence of dysfunctional breathing in adults in the community with and without asthma

Open access
Thomas, Mike, McKinley, Robert K., Freeman, Elaine, Foy, Chris, Price, David·2005·Primary Care Respiratory Journal

Abstract

Functional breathing problems, including symptomatic hyperventilation, may impair quality of life. Symptoms associated with functional breathing disorders have been reported as being common in secondary care settings, and can affect 29% of adults with current asthma in the community. The prevalence of dysfunctional breathing in the general adult population is unknown. The Nijmegen Questionnaire has been reported to have useful sensitivity and specificity for diagnosing dysfunctional breathing. A cross-sectional postal survey of adults without current asthma was undertaken in a single UK general practice. The results were analysed in conjunction with a previously described survey of adults with current asthma from the same population. The questionnaire was posted to a random sample of 300 people aged 16-65 without current asthma, and 69% were returned. 8% (95% confidence intervals 4-12%) had positive screening scores. Positive screening scores were more common in women (14%, 7-20%) than men (2%, 0-5%, p=0.003). Comparison with the previous survey showed that the prevalence of positive screening scores was higher in those with current asthma than those without (29% vs. 8%, p<0.001). Dysfunctional breathing may affect up to one in 10 people, and is more common in women and in people with asthma.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.pcrj.2004.10.007

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Most data are available for HVS; prevalence is estimated at 6-10% in the general population, rising to 29% in asthmatics.

    “Most data are available for HVS, the prevalence of which is estimated to be in the region of 6–10% in the general population, rising to 29% in asthmatics [5, 12].”

    From Dysfunctional breathing: a review of the literature and proposal for classification (2016) · cites this paper as [12]

    The Results report 9.5% positive screening scores in the overall adult population and 29% among people diagnosed and treated for asthma, consistent with the quoted estimates. But the Methods and Discussion describe these as Nijmegen Questionnaire scores suggesting dysfunctional breathing, not confirmed HVS diagnoses; the paper also does not establish that most available data concern HVS. No page numbers are available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Around 29% to 64% of asthma patients exhibit HVS.

    “Indeed, around 29% to 64% of asthma patients exhibit HVS,31,54–56”

    From Physiotherapy Education and Breathing Retraining for Patients With Hyperventilation Syndrome: An Observational Study (2026) · cites this paper as [55]

    The Results report positive Nijmegen screening scores in 29% of people diagnosed and treated for asthma, supporting the lower end of the range. The Discussion says the questionnaire was not validated for diagnosing symptomatic hyperventilation in asthmatic populations. Our copy does not report 64% or establish that all patients with positive scores had HVS. (LLM, conf=0.89)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Prevalence of BPD has been demonstrated in a number of different conditions including asthma, COPD, anxiety, Postural Orthostatic Tachycardia syndrome and post-COVID syndrome, with papers commonly reporting higher breathlessness scores or reduced function/quality of life.

    “Prevalence of BPD has been demonstrated in a number of different conditions including patients with asthma, 21 COPD, 22 anxiety, 23 Postural Orthostatic Tachycardia syndrome 24 and in post-­ COVID syndrome 7 with papers commonly reporting higher breathlessness scores or reduced function/quality of life.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 11

  1. Folgering H. The pathophysiology of hyperventilation disor- der. Monalsi Arch Chest Dis 1999;54:365-71.
  2. Gardner WN. The pathophysiology of hyperventilation dis- orders. Chest 1996;109:516-34.
  3. Han JN, Stegen K, Simkens K, Caubergs M, Schepers R, Van den Bergh O, et al. Unsteadiness of breathing in patients with hyperventilation syndrome and anxiety disorders. Eur Respir J 1997;10:167-76.
  4. Hormbrey J, Jacobi MS, Patil CP, Saynders KB. CO2 reponse and pattern of breathing in patients with symptomatic hy- perventialtion compared with asthmatic and normal sub- jects. Eu Respir J 1988;1:846-52.
  5. Han JN, Stegen K, Schepers R, Van den Bergh O, Woestin- jne KP. Subjective symptoms and breathing pattern at rest and following hyperventilation in anxiety and somatiform disorders. J Psychosom Res 1998;45:519-32.
  6. van Dixhoorn J. Hyperventilation and dysfunctional breath- ing. Biological Psychology 1997;46:90-1.
  7. Thomas M, McKinley RK, Freeman E, Foy C, Prodger P, Price D. Breathing retraining for dysfunctional breath- ing in asthma-a randomised controlled trial. Thorax 2003;58:110-5.
  8. Carr RE, Leher PM, Rausch LL, Hochron SM. Anxiety sensi- tivity and panic attacks in as asthmatic population. Behav Res Ther 1994;32:411-8.
  9. Davis MS, Freed AN. Repeated hyperventilation causes peripheral airways inflammation, hyperreactivity and im- paired bronchodilation in dogs. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2001;164:785-9.
  10. DeGuire S, Gevirtz R, Hawkinson D, Doxon K. Breath- ing retraining: a three-year follow-up study of treatment for hyperventilation syndrome and associated functional cardiac symptoms. Biofeedback Self Regul 1996;21:191- 8.
  11. Grossman P, De Swart JC, Defares PB. A controlled study of a breathing therapy for treatment of hyperventilation syndrome. J Psycosom Res 1985;29(1):49-58.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Thomas, M., McKinley, R. K., Freeman, E., Foy, C., & Price, D.
Affiliations
  • University of Aberdeen (GB)
  • University of Leicester (GB)
Corresponding author
Thomas, Mike
Venue
Primary Care Respiratory Journal
Published
2005-04-01
Volume
14
Issue
2
Pages
78-82
ISSN
  • 1471-4418 (ISSN-L)
  • 1475-1534
OpenAlex
W1965384430
Cited by
166
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 19 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 13
FWCI
1.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Primary Care Respiratory Journal (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Asthma and respiratory diseases
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Respiratory and Cough-Related Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments
Keywords
dysfunctional breathing, asthma, prevalence, hyperventilation, Nijmegen questionnaire, screening, sex differences, quality of life, general practice

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review