Cited by 292Medication Adherence and ComplianceHIV/AIDS Research and InterventionsHealth Literacy and Information Accessibility

Literacy, self-efficacy, and HIV medication adherence

Wolf, Michael S., Davis, Terry C., Osborn, Chandra Y., Skripkauskas, Silvia, Bennett, Charles L., Makoul, Gregory·2007·Patient Education and Counseling

Abstract

Objective We examined the relationship between patient literacy level and self-reported HIV medication adherence, while estimating the mediating roles of treatment knowledge and self-efficacy on this relationship.Methods Structured patient interviews with a literacy assessment, supplemented by medical chart review, were conducted among 204 consecutive patients receiving care at infectious disease clinics in Shreveport, Louisiana and Chicago, Illinois. Literacy was measured using the Rapid Estimate of Adult Literacy in Medicine (REALM), while the Patient Medication Adherence Questionnaire (PMAQ) was used to assess medication self-efficacy and adherence to antiretroviral regimens in the past 4 days.Results Approximately one-third of patients (30.4%) were less than 100% adherent to their regimen, and 31.4% had marginal to low literacy skills. In multivariate analyses, low literate patients were 3.3 times more likely to be non-adherent to their antiretroviral regimen (p < 0.001). Patients' self-efficacy, but not knowledge, mediated the impact of low literacy on medication adherence (AOR 7.4, 95% CI 2.7-12.5).Conclusion While low literacy was a significant risk factor for improper adherence to HIV medication regimens in our study, self-efficacy mediated this relationship.Practice implications Comprehensive intervention strategies that go beyond knowledge transfer may be needed to address self-efficacy among patients across all literacy levels to be successful in the management of difficult medication schedules.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.pec.2006.08.006

Cites

58 of 58 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wolf, M. S., Davis, T. C., Osborn, C. Y., Skripkauskas, S., Bennett, C. L., & Makoul, G.
Affiliations
  • Northwestern University (US)
  • Louisiana State University (US)
Venue
Patient Education and Counseling
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2007-02
Volume
65
Issue
2
Pages
253-260
ISSN
0738-3991 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1988268812
Cited by
292
References
58
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 29 · 2015: 23 · 2014: 18 · 2013: 27 · 2012: 23
FWCI
5.35
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Patient Education and Counseling (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (K01 EH000067-01)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Family Practice › Medication Adherence and Compliance
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › HIV/AIDS Research and Interventions
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Literacy and Information Accessibility
Keywords
health literacy, medication adherence, HIV, antiretroviral therapy, self-efficacy, treatment knowledge, mediation, patient education
MeSH terms
Adult, Chicago, Drug Administration Schedule, Educational Measurement, Educational Status, Female, Health Services Needs and Demand, Humans, Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice, Louisiana, Male, Middle Aged, Patient Compliance, Patient Education as Topic, Surveys and Questionnaires, Risk Factors, HIV Infections, Multivariate Analysis, Chi-Square Distribution, Logistic Models, Risk Assessment, Anti-HIV Agents, Self Efficacy, Antiretroviral Therapy, Highly Active

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review