Cited by 662Health Literacy and Information AccessibilityMedication Adherence and CompliancePatient-Provider Communication in Healthcare

Health literacy and adherence to medical treatment in chronic and acute illness: A meta-analysis

Open access
Miller, Tricia A.·2016·Patient Education and Counseling

Abstract

Objective To use meta-analytic techniques to assess average effect sizes in studies of: (1) the correlation between patient health literacy and both medication and non-medication adherence, and (2) the efficacy of health literacy interventions on improving health literacy and treatment adherence.Methods PsychINFO and PubMed databases were searched (1948-2012). A total of 220 published articles met the criteria for inclusion; effect sizes were extracted and articles were coded for moderators.Results Health literacy was positively associated with adherence (r=0.14), and this association was significantly higher among non-medication regimens and in samples with cardiovascular disease. Health literacy interventions increased both health literacy (r=0.22) and adherence outcomes (r=0.16). Moderator analyses revealed greater intervention efficacy when health literacy and adherence were assessed using subjective measures compared to objective measures. Health literacy interventions had a greater effect on adherence in samples of lower income and of racial-ethnic minority patients than in non-minority and higher income samples.Conclusion This is the first study to synthesize both correlational and intervention studies examining the relationship between health literacy and adherence to both medication and non-medication regimens.Implications These findings demonstrate the importance of health literacy and the efficacy of health literacy interventions especially among more vulnerable patient groups.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.pec.2016.01.020

Cites

42 of 42 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Health literacy positively predicts treatment adherence in other acute and chronic medical conditions and interventions to improve health literacy can increase adherence.

    “This is consistent with the literature showing that health literacy positively predicts treatment adherence in other acute and chronic medical conditions and that interventions to improve health literacy can increase adherence. 53”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [29]Rosenthal R Rosnow RL Essentials of behavioral research New York, NY The McGraw-Hill Companies 2008

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Miller, T. A.
Affiliations
University of California, Riverside (US)
Corresponding author
Miller, Tricia A.
Venue
Patient Education and Counseling
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2016-07
Volume
99
Issue
7
Pages
1079-1086
ISSN
0738-3991 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2264220972
Cited by
662
References
42
Citations by year
2026: 68 · 2025: 88 · 2024: 83 · 2023: 96 · 2022: 83 · 2021: 77 · 2020: 59 · 2019: 48 · 2018: 30 · 2017: 22 · 2016: 8
FWCI
6.87
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Patient Education and Counseling (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
NIH (5R03AG27552-02)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Literacy and Information Accessibility
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Family Practice › Medication Adherence and Compliance
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare
Keywords
health literacy, medication adherence, health literacy interventions, chronic disease, acute illness, cardiovascular disease, low-income patients, vulnerable patients
MeSH terms
Acute Disease, Cardiovascular Diseases, Chronic Disease, Humans, Patient Compliance, Patient Education as Topic, Outcome Assessment, Health Care, Health Literacy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review